Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG
No. They did not legally decertify. CR is right. They filed a disclaimer of interest which the media has repeatedly purported as decertification. Which it is not. By law. Different things legally. I have no read on the case-law but commonsense says the 8th isn't going to all the trouble they have been so far to simply let them off on a technicality like that. But the law isn't always based in commonsense.
|
To clarify my point. Legal de-certification is an indepth process, which couldn't be done with just a letter to the judge like the NFLPA did. However, they certainly now have time to go through and file the appropriate paperwork if they so choose. The main differences, one the disclaimer can be revoked quickly if needed. The 2nd part and what I wonder, is that the disclaimer had to be filed before the CBA was expired, or else they fell under the 6month rule. Now we are eating away at those 6months that were supposed to be a kick in everybody's butt to get one last gasp of a deal done. Instead, we are watching both sides run around in the legal process, and by the time it all gets resolved, the NFLPA will be able to decertify.