Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

RedskinsJunkie · 04-27-2005, 08:25 AM

There is no way Warrick is considered a possesion receiver. I guess he is in the same sense that Coles is a possesion receiver, and therein lied the problem last year with Coles. He would go over the middle, hated it, and wanted to stretch the field. Warrick is supposed to be shifty and make people miss. Gardener is a possesion guy, not Warrick. We do not need another receiver like that on this team.

04-27-2005, 08:25 AM	#14
RedskinsJunkie Special Teams Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Connecticut Age: 50 Posts: 128	Re: Cuts & Pickups There is no way Warrick is considered a possesion receiver. I guess he is in the same sense that Coles is a possesion receiver, and therein lied the problem last year with Coles. He would go over the middle, hated it, and wanted to stretch the field. Warrick is supposed to be shifty and make people miss. Gardener is a possesion guy, not Warrick. We do not need another receiver like that on this team. __________________ Jimoh--- OH NO!