Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

NLC1054 · 07-30-2011, 12:12 PM

There is no reason that Rex should've outplayed McNabb, either. For all intents and purposes, McNabb should be the better quarterback. But everything worked a hell of a lot better with Rex. Tempo was better, the play calling was diverse, the ball came out closer, Santana, Armstrong and Cooley all looked more effective. Rex played with a great sense of urgency. With better tempo.

07-30-2011, 12:12 PM	#57
NLC1054 Special Teams Join Date: Jun 2011 Posts: 279	Re: Are we being fair to Kyle Shanahan? There is no reason that Rex should've outplayed McNabb, either. For all intents and purposes, McNabb should be the better quarterback. But everything worked a hell of a lot better with Rex. Tempo was better, the play calling was diverse, the ball came out closer, Santana, Armstrong and Cooley all looked more effective. Rex played with a great sense of urgency. With better tempo.