Quote:
Originally Posted by NC_Skins
I read this article earlier today and was going to post it so I"m glad you did. Also, I'm willing to bet you many owners would take profit over winning any day of the week.
|
This article actually makes Dan Snyder look better. If he was truly concerned about making profits over winning, we'd be like the NFC version of the Bengals. Imagine how much money he'd make if he didn't spend anything on player salaries.
As for the Bears, I mean if they were truly concerned with making more money, why would they have given a big money deal to Julius Peppers? The theme of this article is that losing cheap makes almost as much money as winning big, yet the Bears aren't a shining example of a cheap team.