Quote:
Originally Posted by sandtrapjack
You missed my point.....I agree with you 1000000%. If you put a player on the field, you put him at risk regardless of current injury. You are absolutely correct.
My point was simply that Hall went public with his intentions, so that brings any hit under scrutiny by the officials and the league. Regardless of any actual intent on the given play from scrimmage.
Point being, that now, with that public statement out there, the league and the officials will be watching Hall very closely is all I am saying and any hit, regardless of intent could, stress COULD result in Hall getting disciplinary action.
If he would have kept his mouth shut, then no worries. But its out there now and he cannot "undo" it.
Regardless, still pretty bold talk for a guy who has a grand total of 1 career sack in an 8 years.
|
No I got your point. But Im saying that the finger can be pointed at the Cowboys as well, if Romo is injured. They know what's coming.
I think it was more about getting in Romos head than anything else... well of course there is the spotlight. But Romo is doing a good job of grabbing the spotlight as well.
If the injuries are as bad as they claim then they should not play him. End of story. Are they not looking past the Redskins as far as having a healthy Romo for week 4? Or, do they underestimate our D's ability to get to Romo?
It makes no sense to play him if he's that hurt. I think Halls calling Romo out on it.
Im not buying the hype. Its really a non issue for the Skins. In the end, Romo will leave the game hurting much more than he came into it no matter if he gets hit or not.
I don't think there will be any fines given to Hall unless they are giving out fines for INT's.