View Single Post
Old 11-02-2011, 01:01 PM   #5
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 62
Posts: 10,401
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonny9TD View Post
He didn't say that you did. You're just kissing tail. And the reason for the defense woes is not the lack of one good cover guy. That's the reason we get ran on? LOL
I kiss nobody's tail. Matty's quote was:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
I agree. Seems a little too nit-picky to me to start singling out individuals when the unit as a whole is struggling and needs to pick it up. Seems like whenever the D struggles it's always Hall or Landry's fault.
Which indicated to me that he was not blaming LL at this point, which I agree with and with which my statement was entirely consistent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeRedskin View Post
As Matty said, however, the blame for our D isn't LL's issues - it's the lack of one really good cover guy.
I should have clarified that I was speaking of the passing D - but, yes, as to that, I think that having one true cover corner would radically improve the rest of our pass defense. Right now, in our pass D, we can't take any one receiver - whether it be a WR, RB or TE - out of the game by assigning a single person to cover them. This isn't applicable to just the league's top receivers, I would suggest it is applicable to every team's top receiver. In light of that, Landry, whose coverage is based on athleticism and closing speed as opposed to anticipation and ball awareness, is forced into playing away from his strengths.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 1.58586 seconds with 10 queries