Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

skinsguy · 12-16-2011, 10:48 AM

OK, so if losing one Super Bowl out of four appearances is enough to say the 1980's Redskins was not a dynasty, then again I ask, why is that the New England Patriots of the 2000's decade considered a dynasty? Not only did they beat their opponents in the Super Bowl by small margins, but they have lost one of their four Super Bowl appearances just like the Redskins. Yet, they are still considered a dynasty. What say you?

12-16-2011, 10:48 AM	#11
skinsguy Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Greensboro, North Carolina Posts: 6,766	Re: The Redskins of the 1980's: Dynasty? OK, so if losing one Super Bowl out of four appearances is enough to say the 1980's Redskins was not a dynasty, then again I ask, why is that the New England Patriots of the 2000's decade considered a dynasty? Not only did they beat their opponents in the Super Bowl by small margins, but they have lost one of their four Super Bowl appearances just like the Redskins. Yet, they are still considered a dynasty. What say you? __________________ "Fire Up That Diesel!"