Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok
I dont see where some of u guys are coming up w these QB scenarios?? Lol rams trading Sam? No chance
Vikings trading ponder after half a season?? No chance and no to colt McCoy he sucks, small and avg arm, I'd rathe have Sanchez. As For Landry jones, I hope he stays at OU he needs it. I want Barkley or Luck obviously that's prob not gonna happen so RG or Tannenhill seems more likely
|
That's what I can't figure out either? No way the Rams trade Bradford, because the QB position is not the problem in St. Louis. I would probably say the same thing for Minnesota. If anything, those two teams trade down. From what it looks like to me, the teams who are truly in search for a QB in the draft would of course be the Redskins, the Colts, possibly the Chiefs, and MAYBE Miami. Although I think Matt Moore has done a pretty decent job in Miami, so you can essentially cut them from the list of teams wanting to draft a QB. Yes, Cleveland, Minnesota, and St. Louis have had rough seasons, but they all have young QBs who are either rookies, or still in development (Sam Bradford) so I honestly can't see everything of them drafting another QB.
This is probably the only time I'd be willing to go along with the Redskins giving up some valuable picks to land the quarterback they want. Then again, I'm not quite sold on that idea, but with the way the rookie QBs have been in the past couple of drafts, I'm feeling more confident that those top QB draftees are the real deal. Certainly I don't think it's a stretch for the Redskins to land RG III or Barkley. I think they'd have to do some very strong willing and dealing to land Luck.