Re: Roster transition in the Shanny era
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012
I think they all did, except perhaps Heyer, who is simply one of two uninspiring veterans on a one year contract in Oakland.
The Colts got rid of Tryon during this season (after starting 10 games on a playoff team last year), and the Giants then picked him up. He's on IR with the Giants, but is also a free agent in March. I don't know where his future is. Probably as a backup. He essentially was a younger Philip Buchanon who could have played inside.
The jarring thing may not be that any one of those players got away, but that 3/5s of an offensive line was deemed by Shanahan/Forester to be not worthy of a roster spot. Meanwhile, we signed Tyler Polumbus for some reason.
|
Williams I can MAYBE give you because he could have been developed to be decent but Rinehart and Heyer were given plenty of chances here and never showed potential for being any good. Rinehart started (after injuries) on a team that went 1-10 down the stretch. Heyer was a turnstile at both tackle positions. It seems like you are looking at anything that Shanahan has done and twisting it to be a mistake.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014
I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!
Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
|