View Single Post
Old 04-23-2004, 01:21 AM   #9
offiss
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 61
Posts: 3,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by joecrisp
I've always felt Wynn is better suited to playing end in a 3-4 scheme rather than a 4-3, and the same can probably be said of Daniels. In this scenario, where the Skins get Wilfork, he would clearly be the monster in the middle, and Cornelius Griffin could actually move to end in the 3-4.

I think Arrington and Washington would be awesome as OLBs in the 4-backer set, with Mitchell and Barrow providing the solid run-stopping duo in the middle. The only problem would be depth at MLB. They'd need another MLB option along with Clifton Smith to provide relief to the aging vets.

Of course, the real question is if Trotter and next year's #2 would be enough to obtain a pick high enough to nab Wilfork this year. I don't know if that's enough ammo. The only way Trotter draws a decent trade offer is if he comes to some kind of preliminary contract agreement with his next team, reducing his salary numbers and cap hit.
I can't see that ever happening, there is no way we can jump into any part of the first rd. with a #2 next year and trotter, we are lucky to get a bag of ball's for trotter, the only way we get into the first high enough to grab Wilfork with a #2 next year, is to send smoot and another pick or a player depending, my thought is this take taylor, then deal into the bottom of the first and into the second as well with pick's from next year and gardner, We then can get either 2 D-linemen, or 1 lineman, and a TE/H-back, perhap's a stark's or dockett, and watson, troupe or peterson.
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.89884 seconds with 10 queries