Quote:
Originally Posted by mlmpetert
Im thinking the way the NFL sees it is that the Redskins didnt necessarily sign a new player during 2010 to a massive FA contract. Rather they just "dumped" money of existing contracts of players that were already under contract, in order to free up money in future years and to get in good fiscal shape.
Still collusion. Still ridiculous. But i can see why other owners, even though acting cullusive, would be upset. But complete bs
|
I will feel about 20% less pissed off if they decide we still get the penalty, but the rest of the teams don't get the money. It was basically a bunch of cry-babying over a couple of teams who had the nuts to do something that might have been immoral, but not against the written rules. Then they all get together and say, "Well, if anything shouldn't WE get a piece of that pie?"
In addition to that, if the Skins were blindsided by this news, that means it's possible they weren't included in any talks or votes.