Quote:
Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689
Seems more like 3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375 10582097494459230781640628620899862803482534211706 7982148086513282306647093844609550582231%
|
Well, perhaps they are trending that way.
I don't think it's likely that both of today's signings are Redskins in 2013. I think if one thrives and is the best FA WR we've signed in forever, then the other won't get enough opportunities to justify his salary, and will be gone in a year.
Not that this is a problem at all. Survival of the fittest is a fine approach to weeding out the weaker players at the receiver position. It's just weird that a team would invest more than $7 million cap dollars (a very large amount) at the Z receiver position to replace Armstrong and not get at least one player with a better track record than Armstrong.
Not that I'm complaining about the depth or anything. This team is just weird.