Quote:
Originally Posted by mlmdub130
The first thing on that page says on a conservative note, and of you read more than one sentence you can tell there is an agenda. Terrible article, by that sites judgement I would be classified as a thug since I have an arm full of tattoos and a checkered past. I'm not going to call a 17 year old kid a gang Banger because he has a few tattoos and has experimented with drugs.
The fact is the police said so not pursue, he pursued and a conflict occurred. Had he not pursued this would not be an issue. And if the stand your ground law didn't exist Zimmerman would be in jail. IMO Zimmerman is guilty of at a minimum manslaughter and should serve years in jail, but due to this terrible law he may never see a jail cell. If anything hopefully this law gets repelled in every state. From what I understand you could pick a fight with someone, start losing that fight, pull out a gun and shoot the person. Such a joke.
And as far as his family trying to copyright things to try and make money. Take a step back and think about how much money this is costing the family to pursue legal action as well as organize protests. And who's to say if she did not copyright these things that someone else might be out there making money off her sons death. She could also start a foundation with proceeds as well. I'd wait a second before I said she was trying to profit from her sons death though.
|
First of the dispatcher told him not to pursue and they are not police. Second when he was told not to pursue he said (OK) what evidence do you have that says he kept pursuing the kid?