Quote:
Originally Posted by mlmdub130
given all that i am just looking at the case from a far
1. you have a 17y/o kid leaving a convienence store and heading somewhere.
2. then you have a 29 y/o man who is a neighborhood watch activist who is armed with a gun start tailing the 17y/o.
3. at some point there is a physical struggle and the end result is the 17y/o being shot in the chest.
anyway you cut it up to me thats murder. the enitre incident was incited by the 29y/o, and an inccocent 17y/o kid is dead. may the kid have been a gang banger maybe. could he just be a young kid trying to be a thug on the internet maybe. i know sure as shit thats what my dumbass 18 y/o cousin does. i don't know what either of their back stories are and don't really care. a 17y/o unarmed kid was shot by a 29y/o armed man. but at the end of the day thats just my opinion and you and i both know how f-ed up the legal system is, even if the defendant is 100% guilty he could get away with. shame is in this case he probaly was within the rule of the law.
|
So now he is an activist?