View Single Post
Old 04-30-2012, 01:14 PM   #10
warriorzpath
Registered User
 
warriorzpath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,880
Re: Kirk Cousins pick 4.7

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
Aren't most fourth round picks considered developmental for the future instead of likely present contributors?
Yeah, it was kind of funny to me how Tedy Bruschi is arguing that this was a luxury pick up because 4th rounders are usually for contributors at Special Teams and depth. And for team like the Redskins, they can't afford to use that pick for a qb. I'll give him the Special Teams contribution, but doesn't Cousins provide depth at the most important position - which solidifies the quarterback position for the redskins, a position that was arguably the weakest?

Then Bruschi turns around and praises the eagles for picking up depth at the qb position with Nick Foles... I don't get it. I guess it's a luxury that an 8-8 team can afford and not a 5-11 team that could have easily won 3 more games if the qb play was better.
warriorzpath is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.69601 seconds with 10 queries