|
Re: Redskins OTAs
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat
He proved he could be productive within our system/playbook even with an inferior QB. Garcon to his credit proved he could be productive within the Colts system/playbook with an inferior QB. But the odds are Gaffney would have a better 2012 w/ RGIII than Garcon because Garcon is brand new to the system/playbook.
But most important is the near certainty that a superior WR, to Gaffney and Garcon, would be available by the 2013 season. So why bind yourself to Garcon, an unproven quantity, for one year (2012)? Gaffney would have been cheaper and more productive by all probability.
|
Who? Who, by signing Garcon, are we unlikely to sign in 2013?
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
|