Quote:
Originally Posted by los panda
they had enough talent to go 12-4, 13-3, and 14-2 in the regular season. neither marty nor norv have ever made it to the super bowl, let alone won the super bowl, as a head coach.
to say the reason that they didn't have enough talent is a result from other teams winning the super bowl w inferior coaching doesn't make any sense. what are some examples of those teams ("with worse coaching and better talent") impacting the talent level of the chargers players? on an unrelated note, what teams are you referring to that won the super bowl w worse coaching and better talent?
if you go 14-2, you've got enough talent to win the super bowl. if your coach is marty schottenheimer, history is not on your side.
if you go 13-3, you've got enough talent to win the super bowl. if your coach is norv turner, history is not on your side.
|
Norv and Marty are both excellent examples of this. Let's not forget Dan Reeves also had great teams in Denver but never won a Super Bowl. Similarly, Marv Levy was the exact same way. His Bills teams lost four straight super bowls in the early 90s. But unlike Norv and Marty, Reeves and Levy made it to Super Bowls. They just couldn't win them whereas Norv and Marty might've coached excellent teams that were probably good enough to win Super Bowls, but they could never make it to one.