09-23-2012, 04:58 PM
|
#66
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction
Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby
As far as our defense goes, I'm not sure what we'd rather have. Haslett's defense has been down, up, and now down so far in the 3 seasons he's been our d-coordinator. Gregg Williams/Blache's defense were consistently good for the most part, but we never forced turnovers. Now that we've had both, what do people prefer?
Is it better to have a shitty defense capable of forcing turnovers, or a solid/good defense that doesn't force any turnovers? I'm leaning toward the latter right now. Look at what the Rams did today against a good Bears defense, versus what they did against us last week. If we a solid defense that didn't force a lot of turnovers, I think games would be closer than they have this season. Obviously against the Saints that worked in our favor, but these last two games our defense has been manhandled all game.
|
Bears defense was in God mode today. They held DANNY AMENDOLAIEHRFD to 66 yards receiving!
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter
"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
|
|
|