Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

gortiz · 08-05-2005, 02:26 PM

I think those scumbags (Z and King) have a thing against Monk. Maybe its cause he wan't accesible to the media, or lound and flashy. At one point he was the all-time leader in catches - on a predominatley running offense, how can you deny that.

Monk's record of 106 catches stood for over 10 years and in the decade of the 80's there wasn't one WR with over a 100 catches besides Monk. In the 90's alone there were 23 WRs with over a 100 catches!!

what in the hell does that tell you?? If Art played in his prime in the pass happy 90's he would have over 1500 catches! You have to figure that in voting for him, he was ahead of his time! He also had a ton of different QB's throwing to him, imagine if Monk had Montana, Young, Kelly, or at best one QB throwing to him for his career! fugetaboutit!

08-05-2005, 02:26 PM	#7
gortiz Special Teams Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 498	Re: Hypocrisy among HOF voters I think those scumbags (Z and King) have a thing against Monk. Maybe its cause he wan't accesible to the media, or lound and flashy. At one point he was the all-time leader in catches - on a predominatley running offense, how can you deny that. Monk's record of 106 catches stood for over 10 years and in the decade of the 80's there wasn't one WR with over a 100 catches besides Monk. In the 90's alone there were 23 WRs with over a 100 catches!! what in the hell does that tell you?? If Art played in his prime in the pass happy 90's he would have over 1500 catches! You have to figure that in voting for him, he was ahead of his time! He also had a ton of different QB's throwing to him, imagine if Monk had Montana, Young, Kelly, or at best one QB throwing to him for his career! fugetaboutit!