Hunter Henry has been out all year...
its ESPN right?....there you go. They network is straight garbage.
Oh here some more media hypocrisy from garbage ESPN:
https://www.outkickthecoverage.com/e...ng-greg-hardy/
Included in that article, which finally discusses Hardy’s past NFL issues in the seventh paragraph, is a handy detail on why ESPN might not have brought up Hardy on their most watched television program Monday night: “
The Jan. 19 UFC Fight Night will mark the first live event of a five-year deal between the UFC and ESPN.”
So ESPN has no issues at all with ripping the Washington Redskins for signing Reuben Foster, a man accused of domestic violence, but the network itself is fine with promoting Greg Hardy, a man who was found guilty of domestic violence — the charges were later vacated when the alleged victim didn’t appear in court — in an actual event where he’s fighting on their network? (To be fair, at least this time Hardy is fighting a man).
But isn’t this the height of hypocrisy for ESPN?
On Monday night you rip the Redskins to high heaven for employing a domestic abuser on your most watched program of the week and then on Wednesday you ask sports fans to tune in an watch a former NFL domestic abuser — while signing up for ESPN+ too — fight on your network?
What’s more this isn’t just any event, it’s the very FIRST event you’ve ever done with the UFC and your own website is using Hardy’s status as a former NFL player to draw attention to that fight and bring more fans to view the event.
And don’t you think it’s awfully convenient that ESPN didn’t bring up Greg Hardy with Jason Witten at all on their broadcast despite the fact that it’s incredibly relevant to the discussion?
Then two days later they announce Hardy is one of the top draws for the very first event they’re doing with the UFC?
ESPN is in the Greg Hardy business, at the sametime pundits like Jason Witten and other ESPN Garbage criticize the Skins move