Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell
I was trying to decide between Hackett and Mitchell.
Hackett knows the offense and has been decently productive WHEN healthy in the past, but that's the key, he could be seen as injury-prone.
Mitchell has size and many more years left without the injury risk. He was a big playmaker in college and is impressing in camp. It appears we got great value for taking him so late in the draft. Since he's so young and has more potential than Hackett, where we know what we'll get, I chose Mitchell.
Even after Moss is gone, if our future is Thomas, Kelly and Mitchell, is a great trio who could be producing for many years.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
|