Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-27-2006, 12:16 PM   #1
Redskins8588
Playmaker
 
Redskins8588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ridgway, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 2,519
What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?

In todays Washington Post they report that Sean Taylor will not be able to make the workouts currently going on at Redskins Park. After reading the article I thought well atleat this time it seemed everyone was on the same page and after his trial he will be there.

Then I went to http://www.redskins.com/ where both Mark Brunell and Larry Michael report that Sean was infact at Redskins Park working out. What the hell? This is like the 2nd or 3rd time within a month that the Post is WRONG. Why should fans even bother with the Post if they are going to be Wrong atleast once a month.

Thank God for the Warpath...
__________________
"I am the best at what I do, and what I do isn't very nice" - Sean Taylor
Redskins8588 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 03-27-2006, 12:26 PM   #2
12thMan
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?

Well, he may be there now but it's possible that when everyone actually reports he won't be there. Besides, I think the organized workouts are still a ways off.
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2006, 12:31 PM   #3
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?

The Post is definitely sucking lately. But I'll bet Taylor will end up missing some workouts because of his trial. He'll probably approach the workouts on a day-by-day basis. Make the ones he can make, miss the rest.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2006, 12:31 PM   #4
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?

who gives a rip about the post when you can get all your redskin info right here,plus here is alot more accurate
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2006, 12:36 PM   #5
backrow
The Starter
 
backrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 36.28 x 76.22
Age: 73
Posts: 1,812
Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?

I wish Redskins.com would utilize transcribers, and put it into print! I can't see or hear.
__________________
'37, '42, '83, '88, '92. Championship!
backrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2006, 12:42 PM   #6
diehardskin2982
Another Year, another mess.
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?

I think last year the Redskins denounced the paper and said it was no longer the source for new on the skins.
__________________
That got ugly fast
diehardskin2982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2006, 12:45 PM   #7
backrow
The Starter
 
backrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 36.28 x 76.22
Age: 73
Posts: 1,812
Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?

Quote:
Originally Posted by backrow
I wish Redskins.com would utilize transcribers, and put it into print! I can't see or hear.
My bad!

I check Redskins.com, and sure enough, they have a story up! (Must be reading over my shoulder!)
__________________
'37, '42, '83, '88, '92. Championship!
backrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2006, 12:46 PM   #8
Twilbert07
Impact Rookie
 
Twilbert07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 60
Posts: 594
Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?

The Post and the Skins' owner are at war. The Post is pissed that Snyder is breaking news on redskins.com. That said, any true journalist won't let their bosses' battle get in the way of reporting on the Skins.
__________________
a Skins fan every day, every way.
Twilbert07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2006, 12:48 PM   #9
BigSKINBauer
Pro Bowl
 
BigSKINBauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 37
Posts: 5,688
Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?

us skin fans are just so damn sexy. there jealous
BigSKINBauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2006, 12:57 PM   #10
12thMan
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigSKINBauer
us skin fans are just so damn sexy. there jealous
You sexy mother f***cker!!
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2006, 01:23 PM   #11
amorentz
Special Teams
 
amorentz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 45
Posts: 368
Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?

Also the Post was apparently pissed that the Skins cancelled the bulk of their season tickets. They used to give out tickets as perks to employees (from writers on down to delivery people), but it turned out that they were mostly just being sold. So the Skins enforced the "per account" season ticket limit on the Post (which had always been on the books, just not enforced) and they had to give up several hundred seats.
amorentz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2006, 01:30 PM   #12
JWsleep
Propane and propane accessories
 
JWsleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 56
Posts: 4,719
Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?

It's odd in this case becuase apparently the post's sources were Taylor's lawyers. Maybe they're surprised that Sean is in DC? Or maybe they said Sean will be in FLA for the trial, so he won't be at OTAs, meaning: When the trial is on, Sean will obviously be here. But otherwise, not.

Whatever the mix up, skins.com are super happy to point it out!

It's nice to have mulitple sources--the Post has been weak lately, but no doubt at some point they'll have something that the skins don't want us to know. My attitude is great, the more info I can get, the better. How else am I gonna waste my time in the offseason?
__________________
Hail from Houston!
JWsleep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2006, 02:10 PM   #13
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?

the post's info came straight from sean's laywers, that's a good source, and the permitted time off is probably accurate too. That doesn't mean sean has to miss every practice if he doesn't want to, but it kinda seems like the skins are TRYING to feed missinformation to the post on purpose.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2006, 02:17 PM   #14
Hog1
Quietly Dominating the East
 
Hog1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 10,675
Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?

ESPN has been reporting on radio all day the based on a statement from ST's legal team that "after much discussion, both ST and his legal team argree that he must miss first camp for trial prep". After much consideration, I'm sure ST can be of great value in prepping his defense!
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios
thankyou Joe.......
“God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs
Hog1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2006, 02:24 PM   #15
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?

nice.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.90890 seconds with 12 queries