Did anyone See!

[pg86]

Ok did anyone watch the NFL network tonight about the Leftwich situation? (I should be doing my hw so I can remain elgible lol) But If #9 plays well this weekend we could be talking about Leftwich in Washington in the offseason! THATS WHAT THEY SAID I had to use Tivo to make sure I heard that right!!!! WOAH...But if so Poor Jason Campbell...On a side note...Im disgusted with the play of that punk (and sapp called him one too!) tonight a knee shot to the balls is an illegal move even in Full contact Karate...So what do u think the NFL Feels about it!!?!?!?

[MTK]

Pure speculation at this point. The media loves to put any big name in D.C.

[FRPLG]

I think that would be the craziest thing ever for Leftwhich to replace Brunell again. It wont happen though. I will officially call Gibbs a retard if something like that happens. The only way it happens is if the start playing Campbell and he shows a complete inability to function. Then maybe they find a vet to come in. I wonder if this is Brunell's last year?

[That Guy]

i was aware that the NFL feels.

and i wouldn't give too much thought to stupid rumors. leftwich probably isn't the answer. he's hometown, but he's inconsistent.

[dall-assblows]

not gonna happen b/c of campbell

[irish]

Originally Posted by dall-assblows

not gonna happen b/c of campbell

Why not? There is a reason JC isnt playing and it because he's not ready. Other more inexperienced QBs are playing and playing well but JC stays on the bench because he's still not ready. I think JC has maybe 1 more year as a skin and then they are going to have to make a decision about whether or nat thay made a big mistake giving up so much for him. In the meantime Gibbs loves vets and BL is a solid vet. I can see the skins getting BL.

[MTK]

Campbell would have to be a complete disaster in order for them to bring in another starter. I don't see that happening.

[NAVYSKINSFAN]

This is crazy. But at this point I really woulden't be shocked. I mean, think about it. We move up to draft a guy in the first round two years ago, coach him up, and then never EVER let him play. I'mm pretty sure that Mark is done after this year and with that said, why don't we keep Redskins tradition and sign Kerry Collins and cut campbell.

I love Brunell but sometimes I wish he would get a minor injury (very minor) I don't wish pain a suffering on anyone. But then maybe just MAYBE then Campbell would get some playing time and at least have a CHANCE to do well.

[irish]

I think at this point the coaches see JC as closer to disaster than starter.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by irish

I think at this point the coaches see JC as closer to disaster than starter.

Based on what?

I know that some people think that because he's sat for a year and a half that must mean he's garbage, but Gibbs is known for bringing his QBs along pretty slowly, so it's really not that much of a surprise.

[BrunellMVP?]

Originally Posted by FRPLG

I think that would be the craziest thing ever for Leftwhich to replace Brunell again. It wont happen though. I will officially call Gibbs a retard if something like that happens. The only way it happens is if the start playing Campbell and he shows a complete inability to function. Then maybe they find a vet to come in. I wonder if this is Brunell's last year?

i think its been written in stone that this is Brunell's last year. Can you reasonably expect Campbell to remain content for another year on the pine? we bench him another year, and he will depart as soon as his contract allows...

as for leftwich, i'm a fan of his arm, but do we really need a QB that moves slower than Brunell?

[BrunellMVP?]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Based on what?

I know that some people think that because he's sat for a year and a half that must mean he's garbage, but Gibbs is known for bringing his QBs along pretty slowly, so it's really not that much of a surprise.

i agree with matty here, I think JC's lack of time is a function of Gibbs' preference for expirience as opposed to his lack of skill.

[Daseal]

Fox Pregame said that Gibbs said Campbell would be ready to start in 2-3 years
Which to me either proves he royally fucked up getting Campbell, or he thinks Brunell will be around that long. Either way, if this proves true I won't be happy.

[celts32]

Originally Posted by irish

I think at this point the coaches see JC as closer to disaster than starter.

Couldn't be further from the truth...Gibbs would sit Campbel for 5 years if him and Brunel were any younger. He likes veterans...always has. This has nothing to do with Campbel's potential shortcummings.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by Daseal

Fox Pregame said that Gibbs said Campbell would be ready to start in 2-3 years
Which to me either proves he royally fucked up getting Campbell, or he thinks Brunell will be around that long. Either way, if this proves true I won't be happy.

2-3 years from now or 2-3 years from the start of his career?

2-3 years from now makes no sense at all. It's got to be 2-3 years from the start of his career, which seemed to be the plan all along.