![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,348
|
Some basic answers about the CBA from ESPN
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2351462
BTW, I dont give a rats ass if its "Being discussed in another thread". |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: Some basic answers about the CBA from ESPN
The next to last question has an interesting answer, in 2008, no more draft. Players will come out of college as free agents and sign wherever they can.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2005
Age: 43
Posts: 262
|
Re: Some basic answers about the CBA from ESPN
This shit is insane. I can't believe what a piece of shit Gene Upshaw is. He's going to decertify the players' union? For what? 1% of the revenue sharing. The players are going to be hating it, although look for people to come to the Redskins cause you know Danny is going to take care of his boys. This still sucks though, the NFL is about to drastically change.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 380
|
Re: Some basic answers about the CBA from ESPN
Here was the most amazing quote in that article:
Quote:
The big question is, can they renegotiate enough deals to get in compliance. The real doomsday scenario is if they can't. With only six hours left, we'll see. Because of the special 2006 rules, it is not that easy to do -- even with willing players. The best scenario possible is if they find a way to renegotiate enough deals to actually put them under the cap for 2K6 far enough that they will be able to be players in the FA market. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: Some basic answers about the CBA from ESPN
I don't really understand what happens if a team does stay over the cap. I guess they would be forced to forfeit games, that would make sense. What if they let em play over the cap, though? I have no idea what's going on...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Some basic answers about the CBA from ESPN
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 47
Posts: 1,319
|
Re: Some basic answers about the CBA from ESPN
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Some basic answers about the CBA from ESPN
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Some basic answers about the CBA from ESPN
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 380
|
Re: Some basic answers about the CBA from ESPN
Quote:
What I was trying to say is that cutting players will leave us over the cap (thought I was pretty clear). The only shot we have is renegotiating deals. The question with redoing the deals is if it is even possible under the current year rules to create enough space to be under, and if so, will enough players "step up". If the Ashburn brain trust HAS a method for doing this and enough players willing to deal, then the question becomes, is it possible to get below the cap enough to raid the about to be depressed FA market. BTW, I think the key to pulling this off actually means making a commitment to Lavar. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 37
Posts: 5,688
|
Re: Some basic answers about the CBA from ESPN
on espn they were talking about what would happen if somone went over the cap. The analyst laughed and said there was talk that the skins would basically be like **** it. We're going to keep our players and we don't care. He said there would be fines and draft penalties. He then said that snyder could pay all the fines and the skins can't even sign draft picks if they are over the cap so it makes no difference...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Some basic answers about the CBA from ESPN
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rockville
Age: 62
Posts: 795
|
Re: Some basic answers about the CBA from ESPN
This is exactly why I have said that the Redskins are in actually pretty good position as opposed to the many who have said that we would be in trouble. Look they will renegotiate the bonuses for 4 years to extend the cap number. Cut the players who are due big money and who are not a vital cog in the wheel.
Also this section from ESPN is significant to us. How does all of this affect the 2006 NFL draft? Signing draft choices will be more difficult this year, because teams can prorate signing bonuses over only four seasons. Already, agents figure the most a top draft choice can make under that scenario is $15 million, a major reduction from recent years. That likely will lead to long holdouts by draft choices. Since we have positioned ourselves with few draft choices we are at an advantage as compared to others. Also in the uncapped year who else is going to out spend the Dan.
__________________
16-0 for 2007 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 47
Posts: 1,319
|
Re: Some basic answers about the CBA from ESPN
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: Some basic answers about the CBA from ESPN
Yeah, Arrington costs more to cut than keep. It actually costs us 600k more to cut him. We really need people to restructure, but it's getting late in the day, so we might see what happens if a team stays over the cap.
There is a line in that article on ESPN that says that other teams have studied our cap and don't think it's mathematically possible to get under the cap. I guess if we get a bunch of restructuring done we'll be okay, but like I said, it's getting late. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|