|
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
07-11-2004, 04:16 PM
|
#1 |
|
Mr. Brightside
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 4,453
|
Madden Ratings Predictions for Skins
With all the talk about Madden, why not predict the ratings of our players
QB: Brunell- 82 Ramsey- 80 Hasselbeck- 65 Hamden- 60 HB: Portis- 96 Betts- 75 Morton- 73 FB: Cartwright- 77 TE: Rasby- 68 Koz- 65 Baxter- 62 Cooley- 69 Royal- 66 T: Samuels- 90 Jansen- 93 Winey- 67 G: Thomas- 94 Dockery- 75 Wilson- 60 Molinaro-56 C: Raymer- 79 Friedman- 77 WR: Coles- 93 Gardner- 82 McCants- 75 Jacobs- 73 Thrash- 78 Russell- 60 DE: Daniels- 80 Wynn- 72 Upshaw- 72 DT: Griffen- 84 Noble- 72 Haley- 70 Salave'a- 68 OLB: Arrington- 98 Washington- 87 Pierce- 67 MLB:Barrow- 92 Mitchell- 70 CB: Smoot- 88 Springs- 86 Bauman- 68 Harris- 79 Brown- 68 S: Taylor- 85 Ohalete- 80 Bowen- 80 K: Hall- 90 P: Tupa- 80 What are your predictions? |
|
|
|
07-11-2004, 04:43 PM
|
#2 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
|
arrington/barrow/tupa/possibly smoot a bit high, hassleback might be a bit low (last year he was the LOWEST rated QB available at 37 lol). I wouldn't even know where to guess on taylor... no idea until i see him in some nfl games... I'd rate coles at 267 though.
|
|
|
|
|
07-11-2004, 05:13 PM
|
#3 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,814
|
I think brunnel will be around 83-84, portis at about 97 and betts a little bit lower maybe around 71 or so.
|
|
|
|
|
07-11-2004, 07:16 PM
|
#4 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 43
Posts: 5,455
|
I dont know if Taylor would be that high, rarely when you do a franchise in madden to you get a guy at 85. Mabye though. Id guess 82, 83.
Griffin will be higher than an 84, he should be atleast an 88. I beleive he was either 84 or 85 in madden last year, and he was rated the best DT available in free agency. (sapps better but becuase of age they didnt rank him highest) Hall will be a little higher then 90 I beleive, he did well last year.
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis |
|
|
|
|
07-11-2004, 09:31 PM
|
#5 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 528
|
wow Madden was a bit generous with a few of our players. I might be actually able to whooop some as with the skins in the new game.
|
|
|
|
|
07-11-2004, 10:39 PM
|
#6 |
|
Mr. Brightside
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 4,453
|
i know that when im drafting a 1st round safety, they tend to be higher than other positions, because they arent one of the "skill" positions, thats why i thought maybe an 85 give or take 2
|
|
|
|
|
07-11-2004, 10:56 PM
|
#7 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hartselle, Alabama
Age: 84
Posts: 659
|
I also thought he was generous in a few of his ratings. However, I think he rated Springs and Washington. I expect a huge year out of each of them - they (and hopefully Taylor) will be our defensive stars this year.
__________________
John Shaffer National Fantasy Sports Leagues, Inc. Home of "The BEST Game In Town" since 1990 |
|
|
|
|
07-12-2004, 02:07 AM
|
#8 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Killeen, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 360
|
Arrington will be about on par, he's always rated like a beast. I think you'll see both Ramsey and Brunnel rated the same, low 80s. Then they will position battle it in the game.
I'd also call Smoot and Barrow a little high and Noble a little low. I'll get the game a little early as I test for EA and i'll see if I can't post the ratings once I have them.
__________________
Redskins fan lost in Texas for 20 years. Need a ride to D.C. |
|
|
|
|
07-12-2004, 11:52 AM
|
#9 |
|
Another Year, another mess.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
|
Here are my predictions:
QB: Burnell=83 (Maddens new Mr. Glassman) Ramsey=83 (toughnes up, injury down) Hassellbeck= 63 HB: Portis= 96 Morton=70 Betts=68 FB: Cartright=75 WR: Coles=90 Gardner=85 McCants=69 Jacobs=70 Thrash=78 Russell=63 TE: Rasby- 68 Cooley- 69 Royal- 66 T: Samuels- 95 Jansen- 90 Winey- 67 Jones-56 G: Thomas- 92 Dockery- 73 Friedman-70 Molinaro-56 C: Raymer- 79 Albright-69 DE: Daniels- 80 Wynn- 72 Upshaw- 74 Clemmons-63 DT: Griffen- 85 Noble- 70 Haley- 72 Salave'a- 68 OLB: Arrington- 98 Washington- 87 Pierce- 67 MLB: Barrow- 89 Mitchell- 70 CB: Smoot- 86 Springs- 89 Bauman- 68 Harris- 78 Brown- 68 S: Taylor- 85 Ohalete- 77 Bowen- 80 K: Hall- 91 P: Tupa- 77 |
|
|
|
|
07-12-2004, 12:23 PM
|
#10 |
|
Another Year, another mess.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
|
all this talk about madden I went to the site of the game and the first pic of the game they showed was McCants going for the score!!
|
|
|
|
|
07-12-2004, 12:31 PM
|
#11 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
|
I think Tupa will be higher than you've all anticipated. He's got a great career average, and punters and kickers age well in Madden. My guess - 85.
__________________
There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too. |
|
|
|
|
07-12-2004, 12:32 PM
|
#12 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
I agree with Brud. I think we're sending Hall and Tupa to the Pro Bowl
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
07-12-2004, 01:25 PM
|
#13 |
|
Fight for old DC!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 47
Posts: 4,101
|
Here are my predictions:
QB: Burnell=86 Ramsey=80 Hassellbeck= 72 HB: Portis= 96 Morton=74 Betts=68 FB: Cartwright=75 WR: Coles=90 Gardner=85 McCants=74 Jacobs=70 Thrash=78 Russell=63 TE: Rasby- 73 Cooley- 70 Royal- 64 T: Samuels- 95 Jansen- 94 Winey- 70 Jones-65 G: Thomas- 92 Dockery- 81 Friedman-70 Molinaro-56 C: Raymer- 79 Albright-69 DE: Daniels- 80 Wynn- 72 Upshaw- 74 Clemmons-63 DT: Griffen- 87 Noble- 70 Haley- 72 Salave'a- 68 OLB: Arrington- 98 Washington- 87 Pierce- 67 MLB: Barrow- 89 Mitchell- 70 CB: Smoot- 88 Springs- 93 Bauman- 72 Harris- 78 Brown- 68 S: Taylor- 83 Ohalete- 81 Bowen- 85 K: Hall- 91 P: Tupa- 88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
