Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB

[djnemo65]

The new MMQB columns ranks the league's qb's from first to last, the twist being that the rankings are based on how King expects starting qb's to perform this season. Campbell comes in at 26th, which is 17 spots lower than John Kitna. Seems kinda of low to me. One can suggest that Campbell is young and unproven, but so is Jay Cutler who charts 10th and has almost identical numbers.　　What do you guys think?

SI.com - Writers - Monday Morning QB (cont.) - Monday June 18, 2007 12:07PM

[skinsfan_nn]

Peter King is in for a big suprise. He's WRONG AGAIN.......NO SUPRISE THERE.

[Coff]

Originally Posted by skinsfan_nn

Peter King is in for a big suprise. He's WRONG AGAIN.......NO SUPRISE THERE.

But unfortunately he's not wrong, at least not yet. As much as King is a ******bag, he can confidently predict that any player the Redskins put a lot of stock into will simply not produce the way the organization hoped that player will. The last 15 seasons are enough proof for that. King and fatboy Pasquerelli will take whatever cheapshots they can at the Skins, but the reason we see them taking so many is only because they can. They may be harsh, but if the Redskins were a corporation, and their players were various secuity options, would you really invest your money in any of them, considering the organization's track record? There are organizations that consistently produce, and there are those that consistently do not, and until the Redskins leave the latter party for the former, jerkface King and his annoying cronies will continue to comfortably trash the skins.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by Coff

But unfortunately he's not wrong, at least not yet. As much as King is a ******bag, he can confidently predict that any player the Redskins put a lot of stock into will simply not produce the way the organization hoped that player will. The last 15 seasons are enough proof for that. King and fatboy Pasquerelli will take whatever cheapshots they can at the Skins, but the reason we see them taking so many is only because they can. They may be harsh, but if the Redskins were a corporation, and their players were various secuity options, would you really invest your money in any of them, considering the organization's track record? There are organizations that consistently produce, and there are those that consistently do not, and until the Redskins leave the latter party for the former, jerkface King and his annoying cronies will continue to comfortably trash the skins.

Said it before and I will say it again: F**K Peter King, and Len Pasta belly those 2 bastards.

[SmootSmack]

I suppose I should correct this thread title to read Peter King

[VTSkins897]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I suppose I should correct this thread title to read Peter King

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by VTSkins897

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

No. Dr. Z is someone else

[skinsfan_nn]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

No. Dr. Z is someone else

And smoot strikes back....whack. Good catch

[djnemo65]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I suppose I should correct this thread title to read Peter King

Sorry about that. It's still early morning here.

[wolfeskins]

whatever, ya know? none of these predictions mean anything. from the way people (who are actually around JC veryday) are talking, JC sounds as if he's really looking good. so i'm encouraged.

[GridIron26]

This guy knows nothing.. He put Cutler two spots above McNabb?! McNabb is way better than Cutler.. what an noob..

[skinsfan_nn]

Originally Posted by djnemo65

The new MMQB columns ranks the league's qb's from first to last, the twist being that the rankings are based on how King expects starting qb's to perform this season. Campbell comes in at 26th, which is 17 spots lower than John Kitna. Seems kinda of low to me. One can suggest that Campbell is young and unproven, but so is Jay Cutler who charts 10th and has almost identical numbers.　　What do you guys think?

SI.com - Writers - Monday Morning QB (cont.) - Monday June 18, 2007 12:07PM

Larry King is a PETER? There you have it djnemo...tighten up

[Longtimefan]

I'm wondering what criteria he's using to make his prediction. These guys freak me out with these off the cuff formulas for success or failure. There's no way he can make a prediction like that because there's no way for him to conclude it. It's like Playboy picking football.........A bad joke.

[gabe1984]

He says in the article that his ratings are based off of each players 2005 and 2006 numbers. Can't expect our boy to be rated too high based on that criteria. I welcome this kind of talk from King. JUST KEEP FUELING THE FIRE, BABY!!!!!! WOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!

[Longtimefan]

Originally Posted by gabe1984

He says in the article that his ratings are based off of each players 2005 and 2006 numbers. Can't expect our boy to be rated too high based on that criteria. I welcome this kind of talk from King. JUST KEEP FUELING THE FIRE, BABY!!!!!! WOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!

Based on that criteria which is the only formula that could possibly aply, it's still pure conjecture to rate Campbell that way because his numbers do not speak for an entire season. Plus every year in the NFL is totally different, and you cannot predict numbers from one season to the next. No one knows how players are going to play the games, if we did it wouln't be much fun to watch because we would be able to predict the outcome as well.