![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2005
Age: 55
Posts: 752
|
57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
http://www.dcprosportsreport.com/articles/nfl-draft/huge-mock-munch-suh-consensus-no-1-bradford-for-skins.html
I really can't see us going Bradford if Shanny is bringing back JC. Even if JC is only here for one year and a QB will be groomed under JC, I would assume it would be a second round or later pick. If you are picking 4th, as bad as the Redskins needs are, you need impact right away. I am thinking OT in the first, QB in the second.
__________________
DC Pro Sports Report - Home of the Internet's Largest NFL Mock Draft Database. Best Redskins Redskins discussion, theWarpath.net |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 69
Posts: 868
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Russell Okung, OT Oklahoma St, 6-5 300 lbs
WalterFootball.com: 2010 NFL Draft Scouting Report: Russell Okung Picking any quarterback in the first round is a big mistake. Jimmy Clausen QB Notre Dame is the only franchise quarterback in the draft. The rest can be had a later rounds. The Skins need to lock down left tackle. Okung will sure up that weak offensive line.
__________________
"HAIL TO THE SKINS" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Swedesboro NJ
Posts: 98
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 351
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Personnaly I would like Clausen however there are bigger holes to fill. Any chance McCoy slips to our second round pick?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Wouldn't be surprised
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 56
Posts: 3,803
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Trade down if possible pick up alot more picks then go OL, OL and OL then LB and RB you can pick the rest.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,440
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Why do you think LB is a need? just curious because I would think that CB/safety is where we could use some help
__________________
"Tough times don't last but tough people do" -Mike Shanahan HTTR |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
People thought a similar Texas QB could be a late first round pick. Instead he became a 3rd round pick.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
In a perfect world we could trade back to around 10 where we could still get an impact OT and pick up a 3rd round pick. I like the OTs this year but not one of them seems like a stud/can't miss LT. A guy like Bulaga should be there at 10 or even later and he could play RT right away for us then shift to LT in a year or two after seasoning.
To me the only guy you have to take regardless or need is Suh...and he's not gonna be there when we pick at 4. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
I agree w/FRPLG, Suh is the runaway choice as best player. He's unlikely to be there when we pick but who knows what happens at the combine,etc. I think a case can be made that DT is a need, just not as big of one. Griffin is soon to be gone & AH is 28.
I hope we don't take a qb in the 1st unless we trade down significantly. I really like LeFevour as a later pick & the guy Lewis from Duke. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 199
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
I hope this is not the path we take. Bradford and his twice injured shoulder won't last 1 half of play behind our current O-Line. Bradford smells like a heath shuler pick to me and we can't afford to throw away top picks.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 351
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Agreed. I think personally Bradford isnt worth a pick unless we get him second round which isnt likely. The only guy i would take first as a quarterback is clausen and only if i was sure he was the perfect guy in the future.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Here, here my good man. How can anyone want to gamble with Bradford now? The stats for his backup/replacement Jones during the bowl game against Stanford just show me that Bradford is talented, but with that much offensive talent around you and that line, even an average QB can look like a consensus All American. Bradford will come in dealing with inadequate offensive personnel. Do you really think he is going to shine?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|