Winslow or Taylor at #5, or #7 or #8?

raleighskinsfan · 03-10-2004, 09:58 AM

According to the Post today, Gibbs says we're staying pat at #5 and taking the pick-

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...-2004Mar9.html

But he also mentions we would trade down if the right "impossible to turn down"offer came-
Obviously I'm hoping for the scenario Joe Crisp posted earlier today- we trade down to #7 or #8 and are still able to get one of our two favorites, Kellen Winslow Jr. or Sean Taylor-

Which would you guys prefer?

There is the "defense wins championships" arguement, but can you imagine opposing defenses trying to stop an offense that includes Brunell, Portis, Coles, Gardner AND Winslow, Jr.? Which part of the field would you double cover? You can't cover the whole field with that many weapons, can you??

On the flip side- having a safety like Taylor delivering punishing blows and snatching picks is huge, especially in big games. But how much of an upgrade is he over Bowen and Ohalete?

Doesn't Winslow Jr. fill a bigger hole?

I'm going to be ecstatic (especially if we can drop to #7 or #8 and pick up an additional 3rd- or is that too high?) either way b/c I love both players....
But I'd like to see if there is a concencus among warpathers....

skinsfanthru&thru · 03-10-2004, 10:33 AM

are there any possible good safeties that may be cut after the june 1st deadline or next year? I think our defense is good enough as is this year especially with how I think they will play under a defensive coach who know's what he's doing. that being said I draft winslow if they r both there but if he's gone and Taylor's there then that wouldn't be terrible either. I remember every football expert and broadcaster saying last year all it would take for Kansas City to win the championship would be for their defense to be ranked around 15th or so in the league and I think our offense has the potential to be better than KC and our defensive personel and coaches are better than KC so why shouldn;t the same be said about DC? How much freaking fun would it be to see the skins scoring close to 30 points a week? if a team concentrates on the run we've got brunell/ramsey throwing the ball to Coles, Gardner, Mccants, and possibly Winslow. We've up close how much a player like shockey can do to an opposing teams defense so why not draft a TE who is better than shockey and even harder to guard? just my 2 cents

cpayne5 · 03-10-2004, 10:59 AM

I don't think that TE is a hole right now. I think we can get by with who we have there now. We don't have to have a pass catching TE - especially with the threat of Portis coming out of the backfield. I like the idea of taking Taylor. With Taylor, Bowen would go back to SS while Taylor played FS. Either 'cane is ok by me.

skins009 · 03-10-2004, 11:02 AM

I would go tayler for sure. As of right now I don't think our defense is gonna be much better than last year even with Gregg Williams running it. We still wont' be able to generate much pass rush from our front four and we still don't have a legitimate run stuffer. Plus we have lost champ bailey in the secondary. I think we need an impact defensive player with our 5th pick be it Shawn Tayler, Tommie Harris, or Vince Wilfork.

Gmanc711 · 03-10-2004, 11:15 AM

I really dont think either TE or S is a hole. I would like to go with Taylor cause he's a defensive guy and I think we need more on our D than our offense at this point. Ultimatley, I would like to see us get a big dlinemen, but I think coaching will help our d alot anyways, so a playmaker like Taylor would be awsome. But I wouldnt mind KW2 either.

RedskinRat · 03-10-2004, 11:48 AM

I'm hoping it's Taylor, having him and Bowen back there will make any offense wince on the way through.

cpayne5 · 03-10-2004, 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gmanc711

I really dont think either TE or S is a hole. I would like to go with Taylor cause he's a defensive guy and I think we need more on our D than our offense at this point. Ultimatley, I would like to see us get a big dlinemen, but I think coaching will help our d alot anyways, so a playmaker like Taylor would be awsome. But I wouldnt mind KW2 either.

I couldn't agree more.

Defensewins · 03-10-2004, 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skinsfanthru&thru

...Kansas City to win the championship would be for their defense to be ranked around 15th or so in the league and I think our offense has the potential to be better than KC and our defensive personel and coaches are better than KC so why shouldn;t the same be said about DC? How much freaking fun would it be to see the skins scoring close to 30 points a week? if a team concentrates on the run we've got brunell/ramsey throwing the ball to Coles, Gardner, Mccants, and possibly Winslow. We've up close how much a player like shockey can do to an opposing teams defense so why not draft a TE who is better than shockey and even harder to guard? just my 2 cents

Defense wins games and championships. Look at both Super bowl participants this year and the winner the year before. The media whined all week before the super bowl because the fan favorites (because of their offense) Colts, Chiefs and Eagles got beat (soundly) in the playoffs. Manning got intercepted like 4 times? The Chief were embarrassed.
I also seem to remember the WR Taylor Jacob fans after the draft last year saying the same thing you are saying now, 'This going to be fun, with Coles, Gardner, Jacobs, McCants and Johnson who are they going to double cover? The offense is going to score a hundred points a game, etc. etc.'
What good is scoring 40 points a game if your defense gives up 41?
Neither one of the two super bowl champions had/have a TE to remember.
Pro bowl TE's Gonzalez and Shockey etc. were sitting at home watching the game on TV. Patriots and Carolina's defense got them to the superbowl. The Skins need to stop ignoring their defense's needs in order to get the next Taylor Jacobs.

Defensewins · 03-10-2004, 12:27 PM

PT.2
I am not comparing the talent levels of Taylor Jacobs and Kellen Winslow Jr.
Winslow is going to be a star, Jacobs is not yet near that level.
I am just comparing the need at their positions on our roster in comparison to other greater needs. We more desperately need a pass rush DE or upgrade the important Saftey position. Free Saftey is the QB on defense. Ohalete is physically adequate, but he is not who I want leading our Defense. We need a team leader like Sean Taylor.

skinsfanthru&thru · 03-11-2004, 12:27 AM

[QUOTE=
I also seem to remember the WR Taylor Jacob fans after the draft last year saying the same thing you are saying now, 'This going to be fun, with Coles, Gardner, Jacobs, McCants and Johnson who are they going to double cover? The offense is going to score a hundred points a game, etc. etc.' =Quotes]

I don't know how anyone could have seriously said that and I know I for one wasn't happy with the pick like a lot of other members here and would have preffered getting Doss and we wouldn't be having this discussion. Plus as far as offensive minded teams not winning or reaching the super bowls lately, I seem to remember the rams winning a few years ago, the raiders making it 2 years ago, and it's not like denver, green bay and new england were just defensive teams. And didn't those two "defensive" teams recently in the superbowl each score a combined 61 points against each other? Am I the only one who see's that our defense will atleast be decent enough to allow our offense to win games for us?

sure either player would be a great addition but Winslow is and will be by far a more unique player at his position. as much as we'd like to be, there is a very, very slight chance of being great on both sides of the ball so why not go with the balanced defense and strengthen the offense which is Gibbs strength? I'll trust in whatever the team decides to do and I'll keep strong to my belief in winslow being the better player for a longer time than taylor but I wouldn't be upset in the slightest if we drafted taylor because he is a very good safety. with either pick we'll be a stronger team and that's all that matters in my eyes.

Skins fan 44 · 03-10-2004, 12:52 PM

Both are tough to pass up. Is Rasby the TE of the future? I think Rasby is a good blocker but can he catch the ball? We can get a safty elsewhere. If Winslow is gone we can get Taylor. I know deffense win championships but you also have to put points on the board to win.

offiss · 03-10-2004, 03:10 PM

I don't see anyone in this draft who can have the most impact to our team other than taylor he is taylored made for us, or just about anyone else as well, He's the only guy in this draft that I have a can't miss feeling about, in fact it's a know doubt about it feeling, the kid is going to be a great one, I really hope we stay the coarse and draft him.

SmootSmack · 03-10-2004, 03:24 PM

I've heard that if they get Taylor the plan would be to play Bowen at strong safety and move Ohalete to nickel packages and special teams. I guess getting Taylor probably means no more Andre Lott. He's no Ronnie, but I think Lott is halfway decent. Maybe he can stick on and play special teams

Phinehas · 03-10-2004, 04:32 PM

I think I'm leaning heavily toward gearing the draft around getting Taylor. If we are certain that we can trade down and still get him, then I'm all for it. If not, then I think we take him at #5. I'd only draft Winslow if Taylor was gone before #5.

--Phin

johnnyredskin63 · 03-10-2004, 05:00 PM

winslow is the man without a doubt.

(my last vacation picture)

03-10-2004, 09:58 AM	#1
raleighskinsfan Camp Scrub Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 62	Winslow or Taylor at #5, or #7 or #8? According to the Post today, Gibbs says we're staying pat at #5 and taking the pick- http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...-2004Mar9.html But he also mentions we would trade down if the right "impossible to turn down"offer came- Obviously I'm hoping for the scenario Joe Crisp posted earlier today- we trade down to #7 or #8 and are still able to get one of our two favorites, Kellen Winslow Jr. or Sean Taylor- Which would you guys prefer? There is the "defense wins championships" arguement, but can you imagine opposing defenses trying to stop an offense that includes Brunell, Portis, Coles, Gardner AND Winslow, Jr.? Which part of the field would you double cover? You can't cover the whole field with that many weapons, can you?? On the flip side- having a safety like Taylor delivering punishing blows and snatching picks is huge, especially in big games. But how much of an upgrade is he over Bowen and Ohalete? Doesn't Winslow Jr. fill a bigger hole? I'm going to be ecstatic (especially if we can drop to #7 or #8 and pick up an additional 3rd- or is that too high?) either way b/c I love both players.... But I'd like to see if there is a concencus among warpathers....

03-10-2004, 03:24 PM	#13
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	I've heard that if they get Taylor the plan would be to play Bowen at strong safety and move Ohalete to nickel packages and special teams. I guess getting Taylor probably means no more Andre Lott. He's no Ronnie, but I think Lott is halfway decent. Maybe he can stick on and play special teams __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

03-10-2004, 05:00 PM	#15
johnnyredskin63 Special Teams Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 203	winslow is the man without a doubt. (my last vacation picture) __________________ it's me,bigredskinfan63 bigledzepfan63 "the sea was red and the sky was grey,wondered how tommorow could ever follow today HAIL TO THE REDSKINS always remember ladies and germs-THE COWBOYS SUCK

03-10-2004, 10:33 AM	#2
skinsfanthru&thru Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Richmond, VA Age: 45 Posts: 3,814	are there any possible good safeties that may be cut after the june 1st deadline or next year? I think our defense is good enough as is this year especially with how I think they will play under a defensive coach who know's what he's doing. that being said I draft winslow if they r both there but if he's gone and Taylor's there then that wouldn't be terrible either. I remember every football expert and broadcaster saying last year all it would take for Kansas City to win the championship would be for their defense to be ranked around 15th or so in the league and I think our offense has the potential to be better than KC and our defensive personel and coaches are better than KC so why shouldn;t the same be said about DC? How much freaking fun would it be to see the skins scoring close to 30 points a week? if a team concentrates on the run we've got brunell/ramsey throwing the ball to Coles, Gardner, Mccants, and possibly Winslow. We've up close how much a player like shockey can do to an opposing teams defense so why not draft a TE who is better than shockey and even harder to guard? just my 2 cents

03-10-2004, 10:59 AM	#3
cpayne5 Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 3,807	I don't think that TE is a hole right now. I think we can get by with who we have there now. We don't have to have a pass catching TE - especially with the threat of Portis coming out of the backfield. I like the idea of taking Taylor. With Taylor, Bowen would go back to SS while Taylor played FS. Either 'cane is ok by me.

03-10-2004, 11:02 AM	#4
skins009 Impact Rookie Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 528	I would go tayler for sure. As of right now I don't think our defense is gonna be much better than last year even with Gregg Williams running it. We still wont' be able to generate much pass rush from our front four and we still don't have a legitimate run stuffer. Plus we have lost champ bailey in the secondary. I think we need an impact defensive player with our 5th pick be it Shawn Tayler, Tommie Harris, or Vince Wilfork.

03-10-2004, 11:15 AM	#5
Gmanc711 Thank You, Sean. Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Gaithersburg, MD Age: 39 Posts: 7,506	I really dont think either TE or S is a hole. I would like to go with Taylor cause he's a defensive guy and I think we need more on our D than our offense at this point. Ultimatley, I would like to see us get a big dlinemen, but I think coaching will help our d alot anyways, so a playmaker like Taylor would be awsome. But I wouldnt mind KW2 either. __________________ #21

03-10-2004, 11:48 AM	#6
RedskinRat Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: I'm in LA, trick! Posts: 8,700	I'm hoping it's Taylor, having him and Bowen back there will make any offense wince on the way through.

03-10-2004, 12:27 PM	#9
Defensewins Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Houston, Texas Posts: 3,765	PT.2 I am not comparing the talent levels of Taylor Jacobs and Kellen Winslow Jr. Winslow is going to be a star, Jacobs is not yet near that level. I am just comparing the need at their positions on our roster in comparison to other greater needs. We more desperately need a pass rush DE or upgrade the important Saftey position. Free Saftey is the QB on defense. Ohalete is physically adequate, but he is not who I want leading our Defense. We need a team leader like Sean Taylor.

03-11-2004, 12:27 AM	#10
skinsfanthru&thru Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Richmond, VA Age: 45 Posts: 3,814	[QUOTE= I also seem to remember the WR Taylor Jacob fans after the draft last year saying the same thing you are saying now, 'This going to be fun, with Coles, Gardner, Jacobs, McCants and Johnson who are they going to double cover? The offense is going to score a hundred points a game, etc. etc.' =Quotes] I don't know how anyone could have seriously said that and I know I for one wasn't happy with the pick like a lot of other members here and would have preffered getting Doss and we wouldn't be having this discussion. Plus as far as offensive minded teams not winning or reaching the super bowls lately, I seem to remember the rams winning a few years ago, the raiders making it 2 years ago, and it's not like denver, green bay and new england were just defensive teams. And didn't those two "defensive" teams recently in the superbowl each score a combined 61 points against each other? Am I the only one who see's that our defense will atleast be decent enough to allow our offense to win games for us? sure either player would be a great addition but Winslow is and will be by far a more unique player at his position. as much as we'd like to be, there is a very, very slight chance of being great on both sides of the ball so why not go with the balanced defense and strengthen the offense which is Gibbs strength? I'll trust in whatever the team decides to do and I'll keep strong to my belief in winslow being the better player for a longer time than taylor but I wouldn't be upset in the slightest if we drafted taylor because he is a very good safety. with either pick we'll be a stronger team and that's all that matters in my eyes.

03-10-2004, 12:52 PM	#11
Skins fan 44 Impact Rookie Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Brazil, IN Age: 54 Posts: 883	Both are tough to pass up. Is Rasby the TE of the future? I think Rasby is a good blocker but can he catch the ball? We can get a safty elsewhere. If Winslow is gone we can get Taylor. I know deffense win championships but you also have to put points on the board to win.

03-10-2004, 03:10 PM	#12
offiss Registered User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ] Age: 61 Posts: 3,097	I don't see anyone in this draft who can have the most impact to our team other than taylor he is taylored made for us, or just about anyone else as well, He's the only guy in this draft that I have a can't miss feeling about, in fact it's a know doubt about it feeling, the kid is going to be a great one, I really hope we stay the coarse and draft him.

03-10-2004, 04:32 PM	#14
Phinehas Special Teams Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 106	I think I'm leaning heavily toward gearing the draft around getting Taylor. If we are certain that we can trade down and still get him, then I'm all for it. If not, then I think we take him at #5. I'd only draft Winslow if Taylor was gone before #5. --Phin

Winslow or Taylor at #5, or #7 or #8?

Locker Room Main Forum