![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 277
|
Sean Taylor's stock dropping?
I am passing this along from a post on another board:
This is (allegedly, as I haven't seen it) from the latest issue of TSN: "Safety Sean Taylor's stock is dropping, according to NFL coaches who watched him workout recently on campus at Miami (Fla.). The coaches also have studied film of Taylor and say he misses too many tackles, takes hits instead of delivering them and doesn't play anywhere near as big as he should." |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
|
I'd agree...I thought his stock was too high as it was. I don't think this will matter to us though as I anticipate the SKins trading that 5th pick for multiple picks.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 528
|
I think this is the same kind of over analyzing scouts do sometimes that is pointless. Lass year its was Terral suggs. Oh he runs of slow 40. That didn't hold him back from getting all those sacks. And it didn't hold him back this year. Tayler is awesome, he has all the physical ability as well as all the mental ability. He has passion for the game, and will get better at what ever his weakness are(not many). Lets not forget this guy had 10 interceptions, and i think ran back 3 for touchdown, and lord knows i have seen him lay some hits on people. And i dont' even watch miami that much. I still think the skins should pick him.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,835
|
Quote:
This is the time of year when the draft gurus start picking apart every single flaw a player has. Taylor is a baller and he's a legit top 5 pick. Great comparison to Suggs of last year. People talked themselves out of believing what they saw on the field from him and he slipped down right into the Ravens lap. Suggs should have been a top 5 pick, and his play on the field last year justified that thinking. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 473
|
I think he is a safe top 5 pick. Too much experience, size and strength to be a bust.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 61
Posts: 3,097
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,814
|
I've seen posts about taylor replacing bowen but if taylor is drafted, wouldn't bowens be moved to the other safety spot and taylor would in fact be replacing ohalete? I don't see bowen getting cut or playing as a backup for what we gave up to get him and what he's being paid.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,765
|
Quote:
I could not agree with you more. Another over-analyzed player last year is WR Anquan Boldin. He dropped to the bottom of the second round because he had a slow 40 time in these idiotic workouts. Five WR's were drafted ahead of him including rookie bust Redskin WR Taylor Jacobs. Anquan Boldin had the best year of all rookie WR's last year, including rookie Cardinal teammate WR Bryant Johnson, from Penn State, who was a first round draft pick. Last edited by Defensewins; 03-18-2004 at 04:49 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 1,501
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
|
I don't agree with those scouts' asessment. I think this guy deserves every bit of credit that he gets. He had what 9 INTs last season? He has great hands (unlike Bowen who finds himself in position but can't haul in those INTs), great vision, great feet (he played RB in HS), and great size for a safety (even if he doesn't hit as hard as he should).
He hasn't been held in high regard for oustanding hits (though he hits just fine), rather, he gets praise for all the things I listed. So, when someone says he doesn't hit as well as he should, I'm not too concerned. If he hits like a very good safety and not like a LaVar Arrington (which, given his size and speed, would not be an unrealistic expectation) then I'm happy. I watched the guy and he IS amazing. He has flaws, like any other football player, but his strengths are overwhelming. That said, I think we're going to draft Winslow. Last edited by Sheriff Gonna Getcha; 03-17-2004 at 06:34 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
|
Who knows what we'll do. We've got a month till the draft, and the 'experts' come out with a new prediction every week. Personally, I'd love to have Taylor or Winslow. Taylor will do wonders to all facets of the defense while Winslow will make the offense very scary. As for Taylor's stock dropping, that could be the Lions (or any other team) pumping bogus information just to try and sway the decisions of other teams' FOs. I trust Gibbs and Co. to make the best decision on this one, so I'm not gonna worry about it too much.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 42
Posts: 8,341
|
I'm with Cpayne. I think that both of these players will be special players. Very special players. Either one I'll be pleased with. Every day picking one becomes harder.
"Hey Lions, we'll give you Gardner for your #6!" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Thank You, Sean.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 7,506
|
I agree once again. I will be happy in any of the three routes we will/should be taking with Winslow, Taylor or Trade Down. Theres really no wrong way to go here. If we could trade down and still get Taylor, which I doubt we can, cause I think Detriot takes him, that would be awsome.
__________________
#21 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
What a great dilemma to have, Winslow or Taylor
Let me see if I can take a different approach to this, which combo would you rather have? Sean Taylor and Royal/Flemister/Chamberlain (I'm not lumping Rasby with those others because he's primarily going to be a blocker) or Winslow and Bowen? Wiinslow seems like the perfect fit for Gibbs' system but I'm still leaning toward Taylor. He seems like the perfect fit for any system. Now if we get Bobby T, it's a whole differenet story
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 61
Posts: 3,097
|
I just watched a little bio and some highlight's on taylor on NFL total access, and all I can say is this kid is a player! I don't care what his 40 time is coming in at, I think he is a better saftey than winslow is a TE, and that's saying a lot.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|