Trade up

tazhog · 04-09-2007, 12:09 PM

Smokescreens, mirrors and magic tricks prior to the draft.... Oh yea, and the rumors... Relax, just a couple of weeks away

Rajmahal33 · 04-09-2007, 12:53 PM

Hey tazhog, what's with all the posting on threads that are a week old...and i mean all of them. At the very least, its pretty annoying

anyway didn't want to start a thread about this cuz its not big news, but I went to the univ of md and i thought this was interesting

Hollenbach Hopes For a Chance

I like it when i see terps become skins, doubt we need hollenbach though.

tazhog · 04-09-2007, 01:15 PM

I'm new to this site. Just found it yesterday. Didn't know I was doing anything annoying... Sorry if I'm offending anyone... Just a diehard Redskin fan who is "keyed up" for the draft and found these threads interesting... That's all...

SkinsFanSince91 · 04-09-2007, 04:44 PM

I wanna trade up, but not this bad.

This would be an obvious and egregious step in the wrong direction for the Redskins

BDBohnzie · 04-12-2007, 12:07 PM

I believe this guy is the only reason the Skins would consider trading up:
Johnson makes a visit to meet with Redskins - Sports - The Washington Times, America's Newspaper

rvd420 · 04-12-2007, 02:32 PM

trading up would be the stupidest thing we do.

EARTHQUAKE2689 · 04-13-2007, 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rvd420

trading up would be the stupidest thing we do.

finally rvd20 makes sense

skinsfan69 · 04-13-2007, 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SonnySamFrank

Ever since I heard the rumor about the Skins trading up to the #1 pick and the interest in J. Russell, I have had a bad feeling.....

Trade to Oakland for the #1 pick:
J. Campbell, #6 Pick, and another player or draft pick.

Which means that Gibbs would be able to start the "8" car next year while J. Russell holds the clipboard for a year!

Please tell me that the Redskins are not this stupid!

Dude chill out. What do you think would happen if Gibbs and our FO made this type of move? The whole city would go out to Redskin Park and burn the place down. JC is our guy. We have 2 number one picks invested in him. He's finally getting all the reps w/ the first team this whole off season which was not the case the last two years. He's finally in the same offense two years in a row for the first time in 5 or 6 years. Do you think we would throw all that away to start over again??????????????????? C'mon. Not even our FO is that stupid.

skinsfan69 · 04-13-2007, 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rvd420

trading up would be the stupidest thing we do.

It wouldn't be if we got Calvin Johnson. But it's not going to happen. If anything we need to trade down and try and get some more quality depth.

skinsfan69 · 04-13-2007, 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BDBohnzie

I believe this guy is the only reason the Skins would consider trading up:
Johnson makes a visit to meet with Redskins*-*Sports*-*The Washington Times, America's Newspaper

He had 76 catches for all those yards and TD's and had a terrible college QB. If his college qb ( i forget the guys name) was standing in front of the ocean and all he all he had to do was throw a football in the ocean he would miss the ocean. he sucked so bad it wasn't even funny. So that tells you how good CJ is.

ps. oh yeah his name was reggie ball. actually i'm pissed at reggie ball. i lost $ on one of tech's game's because ball kept missing johnson who was wide open all day.

Sheriff Gonna Getcha · 04-13-2007, 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tazhog

I'm new to this site. Just found it yesterday. Didn't know I was doing anything annoying... Sorry if I'm offending anyone... Just a diehard Redskin fan who is "keyed up" for the draft and found these threads interesting... That's all...

Thanks for joining. When I first joined I probably made 50 posts per day, so I understand your enthusiasm. Welcome.

rvd420 · 04-13-2007, 02:25 PM

we dont need calvin johnson we need a pass rushing de,like charles johnson.

davelavarra · 04-13-2007, 04:02 PM

Trading up for Calvin Johnson would be so good. I think that trading down is a more viable option, we should add some day one picks in our poor mix.

rvd420 · 04-14-2007, 12:58 AM

we do need a tall receiver,but trading up would be really stupid,not to mention what it would take to get cj.we should take a receiver on the second day.you never know we could end up with another marques colston.we have to many smurf receivers,our tallest one is ryan hoag at 6 foot.

Sheriff Gonna Getcha · 04-14-2007, 01:09 AM

I think our receiving corps is just fine. Brandon Lloyd isn't tiny. Moreover, tall receivers are good red zone threats, but Cooley and Sellers fill that role nicely. Besides, the original smurfs did fine by me.

04-09-2007, 12:09 PM	#16
tazhog Camp Scrub Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 18	Re: Trade up Smokescreens, mirrors and magic tricks prior to the draft.... Oh yea, and the rumors... Relax, just a couple of weeks away __________________ Sonny Jurgensen: The greatest QB of all-time...

04-09-2007, 12:53 PM	#17
Rajmahal33 Special Teams Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Silver Spring, MD Posts: 478	Re: Trade up Hey tazhog, what's with all the posting on threads that are a week old...and i mean all of them. At the very least, its pretty annoying anyway didn't want to start a thread about this cuz its not big news, but I went to the univ of md and i thought this was interesting Hollenbach Hopes For a Chance I like it when i see terps become skins, doubt we need hollenbach though. __________________ McNasty FTW!

04-09-2007, 01:15 PM	#18
tazhog Camp Scrub Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 18	Re: Trade up I'm new to this site. Just found it yesterday. Didn't know I was doing anything annoying... Sorry if I'm offending anyone... Just a diehard Redskin fan who is "keyed up" for the draft and found these threads interesting... That's all... __________________ Sonny Jurgensen: The greatest QB of all-time...

04-09-2007, 04:44 PM	#19
SkinsFanSince91 Special Teams Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Wash DC Posts: 368	Re: Trade up I wanna trade up, but not this bad. This would be an obvious and egregious step in the wrong direction for the Redskins __________________ http://zstiojar.edu.pl/68560

04-12-2007, 12:07 PM	#20
BDBohnzie Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Frederick, MD Age: 46 Posts: 4,628	Re: Trade up I believe this guy is the only reason the Skins would consider trading up: Johnson makes a visit to meet with Redskins - Sports - The Washington Times, America's Newspaper __________________ Bad Things man, I mean bad things... “WE TOOK HIM IN THE SIXTH ROUND SO WE'RE NOT SMART EITHER.” - Shanny on what the Skins saw in Alfred Morris

04-12-2007, 02:32 PM	#21
rvd420 Special Teams Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 227	Re: Trade up trading up would be the stupidest thing we do.

04-13-2007, 02:25 PM	#27
rvd420 Special Teams Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 227	Re: Trade up we dont need calvin johnson we need a pass rushing de,like charles johnson.

04-13-2007, 04:02 PM	#28
davelavarra Camp Scrub Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Vicenza, Italy Age: 49 Posts: 52	Re: Trade up Trading up for Calvin Johnson would be so good. I think that trading down is a more viable option, we should add some day one picks in our poor mix.

04-14-2007, 12:58 AM	#29
rvd420 Special Teams Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 227	Re: Trade up we do need a tall receiver,but trading up would be really stupid,not to mention what it would take to get cj.we should take a receiver on the second day.you never know we could end up with another marques colston.we have to many smurf receivers,our tallest one is ryan hoag at 6 foot.

04-14-2007, 01:09 AM	#30
Sheriff Gonna Getcha Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 46 Posts: 8,317	Re: Trade up I think our receiving corps is just fine. Brandon Lloyd isn't tiny. Moreover, tall receivers are good red zone threats, but Cooley and Sellers fill that role nicely. Besides, the original smurfs did fine by me.

Trade up

Locker Room Main Forum