![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 227
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
Quote:
Brunell couldn't throw there, not even to Moss (last year), and by the time Campbell showed up Lloyd was alread buried on the bench. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#17 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 2 Minutes away from Fedex Field, Maryland
Posts: 363
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
im sure he wont be a #2 receiver because i know that the Skins wouldnt pay a 4th stringer[Randle El, Brandon Lloyd] a 30 million dollar contract
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: round the way
Age: 42
Posts: 2,211
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
thrash always looks good in the scrimmages. i love thrash but there is no way, baring injury, that trash is #2
__________________
SOMEBODY PINCH ME |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 6
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
Trash is considered a great #3 - #4 WR. Because he is very easy to lose out there on the field, especially when on the same field as Moss and Randle El who have big play potential every time they tie up their cleats. Making him a good WR to look at when you need a Catch to move the chains, even more so because he is not afraid to absorb the big hit over the middle.
But no, no way is he a #2 starting caliber Wide Out. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
Quote:
Anyhow, my point is that I think the receivers will do better this year, but I think that's just as much a product of being more accustomed to the system than anything else.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
Quote:
Talking receivers, Moss had a bad year and will rebound. Lloyd probably won't play very much. I expect him to look like an NFL receiver when he does. Randle El will get more looks, and consequently more yards. The guy to watch out for is James Thrash. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Frankfort, KY
Age: 43
Posts: 336
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
While I doubt Thrash will bump Randle El from #2, don't be surprised to see him at #3 if Lloyd stinks up the joint. Unless Lloyd has a DRAMATIC turnaround, I think he'll be headed out the door next season (kind of like Taylor Jacobs).
__________________
Win it in the trenches. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
Quote:
However, James Thrash is the second best wide receiver on this team, so in three receiver sets, he's got to be on the field. It seems to me that whenever Lloyd is on the field, that we are allocating our resources poorly, or at least less than perfect. Here's the offensive skill position players that should get more PT than Lloyd: Moss Cooley Portis Betts Randle El Sellers Thrash That's seven players who have value to this team. Assuming good health, which three players are going to be taken off the field to stick an underachiever on? Do y'all really want Mike Sellers to play less so that Lloyd can play? Heck, if Tyler Ecker comes back healthy, at least he can block. Until some injuries start to pile up, it makes sense to keep Lloyd inactive so that we don't cost hardworking players playing time. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
James Thrash is Ricky Proehl for Al Saunders. Not a starter, but clutch
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
no way. Ricky Proehl could run. thrash has absolutely no speed. he is a good special teamer. no more, no less. if he gets on the field alot this season, it means one of 2 things. the skins are blowing someone out. or they are getting blown out
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
I'd be thrilled to see Thrash get 400-500 yards and 30-40 catches. If he can do that, that means Lloyd and ARE are producing as well.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 68
Posts: 322
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
He must have lost a lot of speed then. As I've reported before Thrash ran a 4.2 40 in college. He took the mantle of fastest Redskin off of #28's shoulders. In comparison, I found
Coles: 4.29 Moss: 4.31 Champ Bailey: 4.42 That's one of the reasons he's a gunner. Unless his legs are totally trashed I think he is terribly under-used. He almost never makes a bonehead play. But I must be wrong since nobody ever responds to my posts about this. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond VA
Age: 39
Posts: 2,583
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
Quote:
I like Thrash as well. He can be a good option on certain plays and situation but, no more. He cannot be a dependable #2 WR, IMO. Clutch? I guess you could say that. He had a few crucial plays in the last 2 years, a couple in Dallas games. Yet, IMO, I believe his is just still a career situational guy and special teamer.
__________________
The redskins pocket is like my love life.....nonexistent and disappointing. -OnceWeWereKings |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
I wouldn't be so quick to write off James Thrash.
What makes Brandon Lloyd better than Thrash at this point? Speed? Athleticism? Yeah, but so effing what? Speed and athleticism don't do you much good when you're too busy being a punk ass to take your coaches seriously. And aside from gadget plays and punt returns, what has Randle El ever done to prove he's a decent number 2? Not much. This isn't to say James Thrash is a good number 2 receiver. This is to say that we have no good number 2 receiver, and if someone's got to take the job, I could easily see it being Thrash. Lloyd is a total piece of sh*t, I hate him so bad. I like ARE, but he's a number 3, belongs in the slot.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond VA
Age: 39
Posts: 2,583
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
Quote:
I agree TOTALLY on Lloyd. He made like, at least a single one-handed catch when he was a 49'er in '04 -'05 and he comes and and does squat. Drops balls, doesnt block well, and runs his fucking mouth. ARE is a diff. story. He stepped up last year when Lloyd was busy jerking off. Yes, he is good for returns and gadget plays. But with enough balls thrown his way, he will be a #2 reciever, IMO.
__________________
The redskins pocket is like my love life.....nonexistent and disappointing. -OnceWeWereKings |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|