![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: Do you approve of the trade for Pete Kendall? | |||
Yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
158 | 95.18% |
No |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 4.82% |
Voters: 166. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#76 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 37
Posts: 1,066
|
Re: KENDALL to the Redskins (confirmed)
Exactly, hopefully we keep those high draft picks to get someone. I wouldn't throw our 1st rounder on a lineman, but we can definitely find quality guys in the 2nd, and 3rd rounds.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#77 |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Southeast
Age: 41
Posts: 2,119
|
Re: KENDALL to the Redskins (confirmed)
Jets Deal Unhappy O-lineman Kendall
What makes me feel great is the choice of words in the first two paragraphs. Let's pick a few out, shall we? Acrimony Bickering Disgruntled Upset Railed Grievances Dispute All used to describe a 34-year old football player. Gives me goosebumps all over.
__________________
Your post count, reputation score, popularity ranking, VIP tag or funny signature has no bearing on how I value you as an individual. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#78 |
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: KENDALL to the Redskins (confirmed)
Honestly, I'd use our first AND second on offensive line next year. If our defense can hold up this year and prove something. I would love to use our early picks on the best tackle (first round) and guard available. The Ravens got Ben Grubbs, arguably the best offensive linemen in the draft besides Thomas, in the late first round.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#79 | |
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: KENDALL to the Redskins (confirmed)
Quote:
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#80 | |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: KENDALL to the Redskins (confirmed)
Quote:
He just got his raise. I think he'll be fine.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#81 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 37
Posts: 1,066
|
Re: KENDALL to the Redskins (confirmed)
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#82 |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: KENDALL to the Redskins (confirmed)
The fact that it's a 1 or 2 (at the most) year deal makes me VERY okay with this. He's a vet so he should pick up on things quickly, and he's been in Jets training camp so I'm sure he's in game shape. I hope the "undisclosed mid-round draft pick" is a 5th rounder and not a 3rd or 4th...
__________________
Tardy |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#83 |
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 36
Posts: 14,185
|
Re: KENDALL to the Redskins (confirmed)
With this acquisition this has to give us the most depth on the offensive line in the NFL with Wade, Fabini, Tucker, all former starters, we are set for now on the o-line once Samuels returns.
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#84 |
The Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
|
Re: KENDALL to the Redskins (confirmed)
Apart from Wade I'd say those guys are on the bubble to even make the team. I like the move, but hardly thinks it gives the Skins the most O-Line depth in the league.
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#85 | |
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: KENDALL to the Redskins (confirmed)
Quote:
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#86 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 37
Posts: 1,066
|
Re: KENDALL to the Redskins (confirmed)
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#87 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 152
|
Re: KENDALL to the Redskins (confirmed)
Espn.com is reporting he has three years left on his deal. 2007 1.7 million (I believe we raised to 2.7 million), 2008 2.3 million, and 2009 2.9 million. Not bad at all for a starting guard. Hopefully we can get three good years from him.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#88 |
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 36
Posts: 14,185
|
Re: KENDALL to the Redskins (confirmed)
Name another team that has 3 offensive lineman coming off the bench that were former starters and dont forget Fabini was a solid tackle for the Jets at one point.
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#89 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
|
Re: KENDALL to the Redskins (confirmed)
Quote:
While that does concern me, I don't recall any issues with him at Arizona or Seattle. Plus, he's from Mass, and playing in NY, who wouldn't be a little irritated! ![]() I think it's a great pickup. 5th rounder is nothing special, and we now have valuable depth. Whether he's a starter or not, he's worth it. My major concern is that Bugel / Gibbs doesn't like Wade right now and wanted a plan b.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#90 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: KENDALL to the Redskins (confirmed)
Fabini and Kendall started together in 2004 on the left side of that Jets line, when Curtis Martin ran for nearly 1700 yards.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|