Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


where the Portis haters?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-09-2004, 04:41 AM   #16
NY_Skinsfan
Impact Rookie
 
NY_Skinsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Albany, NY
Age: 52
Posts: 838
I can't believe how well Portis has done considering most of the teams admit that Brunell isn't a threat and they stack the box against him. To have 800 yards half way through the season is a great accomplishment considering the circumstances. Really, imagine where this team would be without Portis right now. I hate to say it but I don't think we would have won any games without him.
NY_Skinsfan is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 11-09-2004, 08:19 AM   #17
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
Quote:
Originally Posted by smootsmack
Imagine that, Gibbs adapting his offense to his player's strengths. Not changing it wholeheartedly, but adding wrinkles, as Matty pointed out. Seems I've seen someone on this site repeatedly calling Gibbs too old and stubborn to change
haha nice point

I guess the old man does make some changes now and then, huh
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2004, 09:08 AM   #18
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
Quote:
Really, imagine where this team would be without Portis right now. I hate to say it but I don't think we would have won any games without him.
In every game we've won, portis has put up better numbers than brunell... Whether you hate to say it or not, its absolutely true.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2004, 09:42 AM   #19
VTSkins897
Impact Rookie
 
VTSkins897's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 42
Posts: 890
portis and gregg williams are the 2 that have given us the wins, portis being the on-field impact guy obv. as for ppl hatin' portis, who cares? i'm just glad they were wrong!
VTSkins897 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2004, 10:02 AM   #20
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 49
Posts: 2,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gmanc711
Do you belong to another thread too illdefined? Maybe EXSkins?? I dont remember reading any of that stuff here.
nope, warpath is the only board i go to (on ANY topic, sadly). you don't remember the Champ trade doubts?? granted it was a while ago, but the silence has been deafening since.

just recently i had to argue he's our our offensive mvp by far (instead of Gardner?), and he was getting frighteningly little recognition in the gameball thread, even tho he ran for 150 yds against a tough run defense AND had a perfect QB rating!!??
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2004, 10:05 AM   #21
Gmanc711
Thank You, Sean.
 
Gmanc711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 7,506
[QUOTE=illdefined]nope, warpath is the only board i go to (on ANY topic, sadly). you don't remember the Champ trade doubts?? granted it was a while ago, but the silence has been deafening since.

[QUOTE]


Ok, totaly different time period is what had me messed up. I got the idea that it was very recently. My bad.
__________________
#21
Gmanc711 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2004, 11:32 AM   #22
skinsfanthru&thru
Playmaker
 
skinsfanthru&thru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,814
I think one of the main things for those showing unrest with the trade until the past couple weeks is because of Portis' large numbers of fumbles in such a short span, with 2 or 3 of those resulting in touchdowns by the opposing team. Hopefully gibbs will adapt the system a little bit more towards portis's style and Portis will learn not to ever run 5-6 yards backwards.
skinsfanthru&thru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2004, 12:57 PM   #23
offiss
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 61
Posts: 3,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by NY_Skinsfan
I can't believe how well Portis has done considering most of the teams admit that Brunell isn't a threat and they stack the box against him. To have 800 yards half way through the season is a great accomplishment considering the circumstances. Really, imagine where this team would be without Portis right now. I hate to say it but I don't think we would have won any games without him.

I prefere to imagine where this team would be without Brunell right now. :thumb:
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2004, 03:41 PM   #24
SkinsRock
Impact Rookie
 
SkinsRock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Crofton, MD
Age: 55
Posts: 907
Portis has over 800 yards after 8 games. The Redskins had 1,653 TOTAL rushing yards in 2003. He's on a pace to come just under that figure (1620).
Granted, it was Spurrier's offense, but that's still quite an accomplishment!
Oh, and by the way, no Redskin has ever rushed for over 1,440 yards.....ever! Davis set the record in 2001 with 1,432 (I think).

Bottom line, Gibbs will adapt to his players' strengths, and if that means more "zone blocking" runs, so be it. He adapted from "Air Gibbs" to the power running game for Riggins, so if he realized that he needed to adapt again for Portis, then good for him. Also, I'd imagine that if the passing game actually gets going, Portis will have even more success.
SkinsRock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2004, 05:00 PM   #25
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
if we had a passing game, portis would have broken 1000 already
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2004, 05:59 PM   #26
Daseal
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 42
Posts: 8,341
Quote:
Imagine that, Gibbs adapting his offense to his player's strengths. Not changing it wholeheartedly, but adding wrinkles, as Matty pointed out. Seems I've seen someone on this site repeatedly calling Gibbs too old and stubborn to change
I see a totally new strategy more than a wrinkle. I wonder what took so long.
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2004, 10:47 PM   #27
SUNRA
The Starter
 
SUNRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy
In every game we've won, portis has put up better numbers than brunell... Whether you hate to say it or not, its absolutely true.
Boy, you wrote a thread and did not use the word 'suck' in any of your descriptions of Brunell. Wow, your vocabulary is expanding.
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970
SUNRA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2004, 08:11 PM   #28
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
wow sunra, i'm glad you finally got out of 3rd grade, call me when you finish 4th :P
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2004, 08:17 PM   #29
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Ok, that's enough

Read this:

http://www.thewarpath.net/announcement.php?f=2

and this:

http://www.thewarpath.net/showpost.p...18&postcount=1

and let's move on
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2004, 11:46 PM   #30
wolfeskins
The Starter
 
wolfeskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
portis might be the skins next starting qb , he threw one pass and i already think he's better than brunell
wolfeskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.24613 seconds with 12 queries