Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


The Official Cut Durant Brooks Thread

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-12-2008, 08:16 PM   #46
johnerotten
Registered User
 
johnerotten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: commonwealth of va
Posts: 795
Re: The Official Cut Durant Brooks Thread

suisham is the man,i'd never cut him.eventually brooks will be better.he's not the reason the skins lost today,turnovers are.
johnerotten is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 10-12-2008, 08:49 PM   #47
LMsexyAO
Impact Rookie
 
LMsexyAO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 684
Re: The Official Cut Durant Brooks Thread

Brooks is NOT the reason we lost this game, obviously.

Turnovers are.

Defense was lights out.
Offense was fairly productive and solid without those turnovers.
Punting was horrible.

Can't really fix turnovers, you can fix punting.

33rd punter in a 32 team league is extremely laughable, that's all I'm saying. I'll be the first to congratulate Brooks if he even makes the top 15 of all punters by the end of the year, I just don't see it happening.
LMsexyAO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 08:51 PM   #48
LMsexyAO
Impact Rookie
 
LMsexyAO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 684
Re: The Official Cut Durant Brooks Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooskins View Post
I agree about it being a quick fix and Frost getting ran out.

I don't mean to say you're a bad poster, I am bit frustrated with the negativity, and losing doesn't help. My apologies.
No apologies necessary I hate the negativity just as much as you do! I just figured it was about time to address the Brooks issue, mainly because I thought our team was great otherwise!
LMsexyAO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 09:21 PM   #49
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: The Official Cut Durant Brooks Thread

Our punt/kick coverage was awful all day- Dante Hall had some great returns.

Randle El doesn't look too hot on punt returns either. Suisham

Brooks has been miserable. To say "give him time" doesn't really fly with me. In the NFL you don't get time to develop as a punter. You either do it or you don't. And he isn't. At the very least we need to bring in a few other punters for workouts this week.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 09:36 PM   #50
RMSkins
The Starter
 
RMSkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 37
Posts: 1,066
Re: The Official Cut Durant Brooks Thread

Where are all the Brooks apologists now? The kid is bad and they're no excuses left for him anymore. I will give him one more game, basically because there isn't very many other options, to turn it around if not he needs to go.
RMSkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 09:52 PM   #51
SUNRA
The Starter
 
SUNRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
Re: The Official Cut Durant Brooks Thread

Our special teams overall was deplorable. Randle El has to be replaced. Durant Brooks must be cussed the hell out. He has no pressure on him at this point and has done nothing but given up 2 TD's on short punts. Zorn has to fix this problem now.
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970
SUNRA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 10:14 PM   #52
53Fan
Franchise Player
 
53Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
Re: The Official Cut Durant Brooks Thread

Maybe they could do like the old days, maybe the players should have a "Talk" with Brooks.
53Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 10:24 PM   #53
celts32
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 54
Posts: 2,665
Re: The Official Cut Durant Brooks Thread

I would not cut him yet. All we will get is some retread as a replacement and then we could be inviting problems with Suisham since brooks holds for him.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19

“Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.”

www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub
celts32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 10:40 PM   #54
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: The Official Cut Durant Brooks Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by JGisLordOfTheRings View Post
I vote for change thread title to "Cut Leigh Torrence"

Wtf was he even DOING on the field during possibly the most clutch defensive moment!?!?!?

Shoot me.

But F you too Brooks. Not one single good punt today and he DEFINITELY directly contributed to our loss.
I honestly don't know where Landry was on that play. Normally, that zone is all him.

Thing is, we're spoiled into thinking good coverage is a right, but that one on one matchup definately favors the receiver. Torrence is a fine third corner who will get beat sometimes like he did there.

Our depth in the secondary isn't great. You have the four starters who make up one of the best secondaries in the NFL, and after that, you have Smoot, Torrence, and Doughty, and they are all weak links against starting-caliber wide receivers.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 10:43 PM   #55
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: The Official Cut Durant Brooks Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by LMsexyAO View Post
Brooks is NOT the reason we lost this game, obviously.

Turnovers are.

Defense was lights out.
Offense was fairly productive and solid without those turnovers.
Punting was horrible.

Can't really fix turnovers, you can fix punting.

33rd punter in a 32 team league is extremely laughable, that's all I'm saying. I'll be the first to congratulate Brooks if he even makes the top 15 of all punters by the end of the year, I just don't see it happening.
We won almost all the unit matchups except for one, their DL dominated our OL.

That, combined with the turnovers, is the only reason we didn't blow the Rams out of the water. I mean, not only did they not score an offensive touchdown...they weren't even close to threatening.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 11:03 PM   #56
vallin21
The Starter
 
vallin21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,180
Re: The Official Cut Durant Brooks Thread

I still can't believe Torrence was in in the most crucial down of the game. ALL he had to do was NOT to get beat deepIt was 3rd and 15 for god's sake . Thats the kinda crap they teach you in high school. I don't know why Smoot was not in on that play. Man I'm gonna have a long day tomarrow. Oh well I guess they should change this into the cut Brooks/ Torrence Thread
vallin21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 11:07 PM   #57
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: The Official Cut Durant Brooks Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by vallin21 View Post
I still can't believe Torrence was in in the most crucial down of the game. ALL he had to do was NOT to get beat deepIt was 3rd and 15 for god's sake . Thats the kinda crap they teach you in high school. I don't know why Smoot was not in on that play. Man I'm gonna have a long day tomarrow. Oh well I guess they should change this into the cut Brooks/ Torrence Thread
Torrence has been a solid backup and was very good in the Dallas game when Springs went down and Smoot/Rogers were in and out with cramps. To say "cut him" after one play is silly. Bottom line is, as a team, we should never have been in that position to begin with. Should we cut Samuels and Randy Thomas because our bad pass protection led to fumbles? Should we cut Pete Kendall for trying to run with that tipped pass instead of just falling on it? Come on. Everyone just calm down with this cut Torrence crap.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 11:12 PM   #58
vallin21
The Starter
 
vallin21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,180
Re: The Official Cut Durant Brooks Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
Torrence has been a solid backup and was very good in the Dallas game when Springs went down and Smoot/Rogers were in and out with cramps. To say "cut him" after one play is silly. Bottom line is, as a team, we should never have been in that position to begin with. Should we cut Samuels and Randy Thomas because our bad pass protection led to fumbles? Should we cut Pete Kendall for trying to run with that tipped pass instead of just falling on it? Come on. Everyone just calm down with this cut Torrence crap.
I never said "cut" him I was just saying that smoot should be in. I did not know he had cramps.
vallin21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 11:18 PM   #59
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
Re: The Official Cut Durant Brooks Thread

I think the punter should not be that high up in the Redskins priorities to fix the quagmire they had today.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 11:35 PM   #60
RMSkins
The Starter
 
RMSkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 37
Posts: 1,066
Re: The Official Cut Durant Brooks Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
I think the punter should not be that high up in the Redskins priorities to fix the quagmire they had today.
Are you kidding me? It's one of the top priorities. Brooks has been handing teams great field position all year, he had two punts returned for td's against him because of horrible hangtime and directional punting, he botched a hold. Simply put the kid has been horrible and he needs to improve this week or he needs to be out of here. Just look at Zorn's quote after the game, “We have to improve our punting or we’re gonna be in trouble every game. Either we bring someone in to compete we get our punter — who’s a young guy — to improve.”
RMSkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.31399 seconds with 12 queries