Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Offense = Disappointment

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-13-2009, 09:58 PM   #31
dmvskinzfan08
Impact Rookie
 
dmvskinzfan08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 968
Re: Offense = Disappointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by JWsleep View Post
I wonder if Zorn is trying to adapt too much to the players he has--CP, in particular. Yes, we've got CP and Buges, but maybe we should throw first to set up the run?

And there is something to JC in the shotgun and hurry-up. He was quick and decisive there--yes, the gints were in prevent, but he didn't hesitate.

I still feel, either way, that we'll look better next week and everyone will say, Oh, Zorn opened it up, JC found some skill, etc. etc. The gints are good at defense. They make you look bad. Not an excuse, just a fact. Good teams find a way to win anyway. We didn't. But I'm not sure a total tear-down is in order.

Yeah I think Jason Campbell looks good in the shotgun. He always looks good in the hurry up. So why aren't we incorporating this more. I think the problem is he isn't chanign the plans to utilize the players he has. Another thing people have to keep in mind. He came from the AFC West. He needs to get it in his head. This is the NFC Beast. Smash mouth football. He needs to run the ball down their throat and atleast take one shot down the field each quarter. Also I have to scream this. WTF is up with our time management. We did this a few times last year. Like we just give up and don't have a sense of urgency. The coaching really sucks man. I hope Zorn steps up. Because there are high school coaches that can call better plays and game manage better than this.
__________________
HTTR 09 - RIP#21
HATERS << Misery Loves Company
dmvskinzfan08 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 09-13-2009, 10:11 PM   #32
insideman
Special Teams
 
insideman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 114
Re: Offense = Disappointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longtimefan View Post
It's been said many times and in many different ways, but the bottom line is (and there's only one way to say it) the offense lacks consistency. Identifying the problem is not that difficult, knowing what to do about is what's more important. Do you think the coaches know what to do?
My opinion is the coachs don't know what to do. I trully feel if they knew what to do we might not have alot of these problems. But what they do know how to do pretty good is make silly, pathetic, stupid, etc. excuses for the way this team plays. Until Zorn stands up and gets up in all the players asses (provided Synder will let him be a man, ) there will be no disclipine like there has been any way.
insideman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2009, 11:22 PM   #33
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
Re: Offense = Disappointment

There is one area of the offense that gets a straight F grade on the day.

I'm still in shock looking at the numbers.

The passing game to the outside was quite literally non existent today.

It's laughable that we did that. It's clown shoes cowardly football. I just don't know yet if it was JC or JZ who didn't have the balls to throw outside.
wilsowilso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2009, 11:45 PM   #34
WaldSkins
Playmaker
 
WaldSkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 42
Posts: 2,726
Re: Offense = Disappointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsowilso View Post
There is one area of the offense that gets a straight F grade on the day.

I'm still in shock looking at the numbers.

The passing game to the outside was quite literally non existent today.

It's laughable that we did that. It's clown shoes cowardly football. I just don't know yet if it was JC or JZ who didn't have the balls to throw outside.
U mean our top two receivers who combined for 12 yeards on three catches?
__________________
"I would change that around, Jesus isn't Cutler. I guarantee you Jesus couldnt thread the ball like Jay does."-Monksdown
WaldSkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 12:28 AM   #35
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
Re: Offense = Disappointment

Here's my beef with the offense....

- Trick plays against a top defense = bad idea.

- I could be wrong but I got the sense that JC was looking for the deep ball wayyy too much (hence the Osi strip)

- Cooley fumbled once (recovered out of bounds) and almost fumbled a second time, WTF?

- When playing a top defense, can JC use his feet a bit better in the pocket and maybe look to the run a bit more?

- The accidental screen to Betts looked great, I think they should look into doing a bit more of those against aggressive blitzing defenses.

ARE looked great in the slot, but he shouldn't be the only one catching the ball. Cooley needs to stop f'ing fumbling, and our running game needs to get better.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 12:31 AM   #36
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,439
Re: Offense = Disappointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
Lack of play call imagination. Zorn looked like a fish out of water with is tasteless dressing vanilla calls. They locked up Moss and took their chances with Cooley so why not go after them with TE all day? F*cking A. Pierce can't run for shit and you let him off the hook.

Heyer got his salad tossed by Tuck. Thomas didn't do shit. Why the fuck didn't we run right all day long? Instead of 3 WR sets why not have extra TE on the left to run block? I can't believe we couldn't get 4 yards with that all day long.
lol. nice way to put it. but were you honestly expecting heyer to hold down tuck? c'mon.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 12:36 AM   #37
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Offense = Disappointment

I'm curious what ya'll think of this idea. What if Zorn went "sink or swim" w/ Kelly and Thomas at #1 and #2 WR?

Moss doesn't look like a legit #1 WR anymore (some would argue he never did) and ultimately we're not gonna achieve jack unless these two guys actually produce. Also Moss is responsible for JC's INT...typical Moss he just gives up part of the time as he did in GB two years ago. I would honestly like to see Moss benched next week and Zorn start Kelley and Thomas and play them the entire game. Moss can take turns in the slot w/ ARL.
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 12:48 AM   #38
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: Offense = Disappointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
I'm curious what ya'll think of this idea. What if Zorn went "sink or swim" w/ Kelly and Thomas at #1 and #2 WR?

Moss doesn't look like a legit #1 WR anymore (some would argue he never did) and ultimately we're not gonna achieve jack unless these two guys actually produce. Also Moss is responsible for JC's INT...typical Moss he just gives up part of the time as he did in GB two years ago. I would honestly like to see Moss benched next week and Zorn start Kelley and Thomas and play them the entire game. Moss can take turns in the slot w/ ARL.
I don't think I'd criticize him for this. I personally don't think Thomas can play, but if he's going to get a shot at the expense of someone that isn't Malcolm Kelly, it's probably worth the oppertunity cost.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 12:52 AM   #39
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
Re: Offense = Disappointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
I don't think I'd criticize him for this. I personally don't think Thomas can play, but if he's going to get a shot at the expense of someone that isn't Malcolm Kelly, it's probably worth the oppertunity cost.
I would rather try that crazy idea with Marko Mitchell over Devin Thomas.

Santana is still a fine player, but damn did he have a pitiful game today.
wilsowilso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 01:02 AM   #40
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
Re: Offense = Disappointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsowilso View Post
I would rather try that crazy idea with Marko Mitchell over Devin Thomas.

Santana is still a fine player, but damn did he have a pitiful game today.


Here's reason #1523 why I hate these one player hate-threads (when they are about players that certain people just hate no matter what)...there's a thread about how terrible D. Hall was....and yes we gave him money and he sucked it up against a young receiver. But, as I said, you lose as a team, and if you're going to bitch and whine about D. Hall then let's also talk bout Santana Moss....he's our #1 receiver, he's supposed to be one of our best offensive weapons...instead he almost cost the team a terrible personal foul penalty, a pass was picked in front of him, and he was basically a non-factor.

That said, I say hell let's throw the young wideouts to the fire if the likes of Santana are not going to get their act together.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 02:56 AM   #41
redskinem
Camp Scrub
 
redskinem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 6
Thumbs down Re: Offense = Disappointment

Is it just only me or what, Portis is tip toeing like Stephen Davis use to do . I watched other backs in the league and they run with a purpose, time for his ass to go to.
redskinem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 03:15 AM   #42
number21isabadman
Special Teams
 
number21isabadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Oregon
Age: 40
Posts: 157
Re: Offense = Disappointment

On a lighter note.This just in, 4 picks by the supposedly next great franchise qb in chicago, jay aka "I think im the next farve" cutler. Thank god chicago outbid us for him, they can keep him.
number21isabadman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 03:29 AM   #43
dmvskinzfan08
Impact Rookie
 
dmvskinzfan08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 968
Re: Offense = Disappointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by number21isabadman View Post
On a lighter note.This just in, 4 picks by the supposedly next great franchise qb in chicago, jay aka "I think im the next farve" cutler. Thank god chicago outbid us for him, they can keep him.
The offense needs to play with more swagger. Its like we are just going through the motions. But I haven't seen a game this bad as far as efficiency goes in a while. Our team seems like they are not motivated.
__________________
HTTR 09 - RIP#21
HATERS << Misery Loves Company
dmvskinzfan08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 03:53 AM   #44
bedlamVR
Special Teams
 
bedlamVR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 389
Re: Offense = Disappointment

Moss was terrible and I hope other pick up on this .

The Int - Sure it should never have been thrown because Campbell was well beyond the line, BUT Moss was no where on that play . And this is the point people want to Jump on Campbell but Moss turns up for about 30% of the games . He almost got himself ejected and that would have been nothing but a good thing given how badly he played .

Kelly and Thomas need to play better, the bright spot was ARE . Cooley was solid as always and even Davis had a possitive impact yesterday with solid blocking especially on the fack FG ...

Overall I give the team a C ... needs to improve ..
bedlamVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 04:07 AM   #45
DBUCHANON101
The Starter
 
DBUCHANON101's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,373
Re: Offense = Disappointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by number21isabadman View Post
On a lighter note.This just in, 4 picks by the supposedly next great franchise qb in chicago, jay aka "I think im the next farve" cutler. Thank god chicago outbid us for him, they can keep him.
I say lets give it a few yrs, you know when he has a true number 1 wr. Not a special teams ace turned wr out of necessity. Oh yeah i forgot this one.
ITS HIS FIRST GAME IN A NEW OFFENSE.
__________________
But there's booze in the blender. And soon it will render. That frozen concoction that helps me hang on.
DBUCHANON101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.39963 seconds with 12 queries