![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: Your opinion on the Redskins signing Larry Johnson | |||
Thumbs up |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
119 | 76.77% |
Thumbs down |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
36 | 23.23% |
Voters: 155. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#136 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Redskins Sign Larry Johnson
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#137 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: Redskins Sign Larry Johnson
With only 5 picks in the draft it's obvious some holes are gonna have to be filled with free agents... which happens to mostly be older vets.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#138 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: SF, Bay Area
Posts: 392
|
Re: Redskins Sign Larry Johnson
I believe LJ still has a lot left in the tank. At this point in his career, LaDanian Tomlinson has 141 games played, Larry Johnson 82 games. If he can stay healthy our running game is going to be sick next year.
__________________
Team McNabb! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#139 |
The Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,994
|
Re: Redskins Sign Larry Johnson
I am going to abstain from voting on this one. I don't care who is pounding the rock, unless there is a significant upgrade on the O-line, it just sounds like a status-quo.
I think the team got better with this signing......financially. Who is/was a better back at age 29? LJ now? Or CP when he was 29? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#140 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Redskins Sign Larry Johnson
Quote:
As for LJ, it's been mentioned already I believe but we should probably hope he reaches $12 million +, because that would mean he performed well, was on his best behavior, and the team was successful. If those things don't happen he's not even getting a third of that money. Of the 30 year old backs out on the market, he has by far the least wear and tear of them all, even less than CP I believe (though he's older). On the field, I like this move better than Parker because a) if Parker doesn't have his speed then what does he offer really, at least LJ you get a 230 lb. power back and b) now we can focus on getting a young speedster in the draft (cough...CJ Spiller...cough, though apparently Joe McKnight is high on our radar) Off the field, I don't mean to make light of his domestic abuse incidents and allegations but I think there's a misconception that he went around punching women. As I understand, one time he was charged for waving a gun during an argument with his girlfriend, another time he was accused of throwing a drink in a girl's face at a club. One time I heard he allegedly pushed some woman down those claims were apparently found to be unsubstantiated, if I recall correctly. Again, not trying to make light of it or justify it. Just saying it doesn't seem like he was going Chuck Norris on a bunch of women.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#141 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 54
Posts: 2,665
|
Re: Redskins Sign Larry Johnson
Quote:
__________________
Section 116 Row 19 “Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.” www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#142 | |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Chesapeake, Virginia
Posts: 48
|
Re: Redskins Sign Larry Johnson
Quote:
![]()
__________________
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#143 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Redskins Sign Larry Johnson
SmootSmack is right, I think some of Larry's off field issues have been blown a tad out of proportion. To the best of my knowledge the guy has never been accused of sexual assault, and not to hijack this thread, but the Commish has been curiously quiet, yet again, on Big Ben's case. Just saying.
I think LJ will work out just fine here. His stats in terms of games played, career carries, and total yardage speak for themselves. He just doesn't have as much wear and tear as some are trying to suggest. Some may be forgetting that Larry Johnson has really good hands and can be a threat out of the backfield. We'll see though. I'm cautiously excited about this signing. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#144 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: Redskins Sign Larry Johnson
I do like the idea of a 230lb banger wearing down defenses late in the game.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#145 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
|
Re: Redskins Sign Larry Johnson
Ha-ha. That put a smile on my face just thinking about it.
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#146 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Redskins Sign Larry Johnson
Speaking of wear and tear. I checked Adrian Peterson's stats and he's on pace to shatter anything we've seen recently.
Over the first three years of his career, Adrian Peterson has 915 carries. Larry Johnson over the first five years had a very comparable 1,050 carries. For his career LJ has 1,421 carries. Adrian Peterson could come very close to LJ's career number of carries by season's end. Especially now that Chester Peterson is no longer coming off the bench to spell Peterson. Just adding a little perspective. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#147 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 54
Posts: 2,665
|
Re: Redskins Sign Larry Johnson
Quote:
__________________
Section 116 Row 19 “Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.” www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#148 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: fresno ca
Posts: 377
|
Re: Redskins Sign Larry Johnson
give lj a chance he can still breakem for the big play and he gives us a better threat than betts ever was
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#149 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fort Bliss, TX
Posts: 2,277
|
Re: Redskins Sign Larry Johnson
Quote:
with a younger back taken in the mid - late rounds of the draft. Its not a reach to think that with Shanahan. And for the people that keep quoting my posts acting like I am an idiot because I dont put names of possible alternatives to LJ in them, think about what you are saying, and then think about what I said. The RB's before shanahan molded them didn't have any real degrees of success, or were not known previous to entrance into his system, or RB factory, so to say. Just knowing his tendencies and track record with young RB's, this signing just didnt make sense. I hate the fact that we only have five picks. I think if we had the 7 or maybe 8 picks, this move doesnt even get made. But, heres to hoping. I can see the upside at the end of the tunnel now, one might say. I dont post without doing some research or reading posts made earlier in the thread, contrary to your beliefs, Smoot. It sees like the people ridiculing my posts concerning this issue aren't really taking into full account what I was saying, but hey, thats ok. Its all in good fun, and all in hopes of a brighter tomorrow for the squad we all love. Passion is good. I love the degree of talk on these forums. They have more free minded intellectual members than all the other Redskins boards combined!! I might even think about splurging and giving $20 of my E-5 pay to the movement!!!! (and thats saying alot, knowing how much E-5's in the army get paid!) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#150 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Redskins Sign Larry Johnson
Mechanix, I was primarily referring to this line of yours in a previous post "On an additional note, I love how noone questions these moves, or lack thereof"
Several people have questioned many moves since Shanahan came on board, even his coming on board. It would be wrong, totally wrong, to say there has been absolute blind faith in all the moves
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|