![]() |
![]() |
#46 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,712
|
Re: Malcolm Kelly possible cut?
Quote:
__________________
Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#47 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
|
Re: Malcolm Kelly possible cut?
I thought thomas made some nice tackles on specials last year. I remember at least one play where he was the first one down there and made a nice open field tackle on the returner.
__________________
Life is brutal, but beautiful |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,450
|
Re: Malcolm Kelly possible cut?
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,839
|
Re: Malcolm Kelly possible cut?
How quickly we forget about those 7 catches...
in the first 5 games ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,163
|
Re: Malcolm Kelly possible cut?
lol!!!
__________________
BP Bush/Palin 2012 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#51 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,701
|
Re: Malcolm Kelly possible cut?
RedskinsDotCom
RT @RedskinsBlog Saw WR Anthony Armstrong heading back to review film on Monday. Guess that's how you get to be a breakout guy in mini-camp. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 3,543
|
Re: Malcolm Kelly possible cut?
I agree completely. Shanny probably doesn't want him here but if they do wind up signing him the only kind of contract I am sure they would give him would be little or no guaranteed and it would all be performance based. PS I am proud to announce this is my century mark post and I am no longer a camp scrub! HAIL!!
__________________
Sean Taylor #21 a Redskin forever... Team Heinicke Fan Club punch it in - CEO SkinzWin - President FrenchSkin - VP of Global Operations ODUsmitty - Director of Cheerleader Fulfillment Meks - Director of Marketing |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,261
|
Re: Malcolm Kelly possible cut?
Vikings claim Marko Mitchell | ProFootballTalk.com
If Farve comes back i predict huge things for the kid. Almost started a new thread, that would undoubtedly become a sticky, titled "Marko Mitchell proves everyone but me wrong".
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: Malcolm Kelly possible cut?
Quote:
They had virtually the exact same stats last year not to mention that Malcolm has the best hands on the team. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Malcolm Kelly possible cut?
I'd take that bet because I doubt the Shanahans are going to cut a 3rd year receiver that they are just starting to work with. A better bet would be if they bring in TO at some point in camp to replace Galloway/Wade/Furrey. If you're going with an older receiver, why not go with one that's closer to his elite status than one 3 years removed or a never was like Wade or Furrey?
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fort Bliss, TX
Posts: 2,277
|
Re: Malcolm Kelly possible cut?
Quote:
Most of the Fans on this here forum are way too forgiving. Most of ya held out for J.C, hoping he would turn it around, and the same is true for D. Thomas and M. Kelly, hoping they will EVENTUALLY turn it ON. Its funny the one guy that impressed us the most and has the prototypical build for a WR, and is also the youngest and has shown the most talent, we get rid of and let the Vikes pick him up. Tis a shame. Right now, I'd take Marko Mitchell over both of these underachieving bums. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,440
|
Re: Malcolm Kelly possible cut?
I think it's pretty incredible that of the 3 pass catchers we drafted in the 2nd round of the draft 3 years ago...Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly have been utter busts but we have found an absolute gem in Fred Davis.
I mean, who would have predicted that 3 years down the road, Fred Davis would be viewed as a potential game-changer but DT and MK have shown that they suck.
__________________
"Tough times don't last but tough people do" -Mike Shanahan HTTR |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Malcolm Kelly possible cut?
Marko Mitchell hasn't proved anything in the NFL. He doesn't have any more a prototypical WR build than either Kelly or Thomas. If either Kelly or Thomas were to get cut, they'd be picked up just as fast by another team
And remember Mitchell has already been cut by one team since he was cut by the Redskins
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Malcolm Kelly possible cut?
Quote:
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#60 |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fort Bliss, TX
Posts: 2,277
|
Re: Malcolm Kelly possible cut?
Seems like the arguement for just "One more season" of evaluation always trumps anything else. Good players, and especially ones that are destined to be great, excel no matter the situation. Who gives a shit you have a shitty coach, produce. Run your routes, show us your potential. Lack of good coaching is no excuse for lack of production or at least a glimpse of production.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|