Why in the heck did Synder keep Turner over Casserly?

[jamf]

Originally Posted by skins009

Let me tell you something about Casserly, he's terrible. Anybody who needs evidence of this needs to just look at his record in Houston. For some reason which I will never understand he has the reputation of dong such a great job when he was in DC. Well he didn't do shit, it was Beathard who deserves the credit. And and as soon as he took over, everything went to shit.

Beathard came to san diego and ran it into the ground. he was trading first round picks for second round picks:
Charlie Jones
Brian Still
Mikheal Ricks
Terell Fletcher

Mike Shanahan went 8-12 with the raiders then went on to denver to win superbowls.

Belichick was 34-42 with the browns before moving on to new england.

Joe Gibbs made the hall of fame and is struggling in his return.

George Seifert Inherited a superbowl team and won, then went to carolina and sucked ass.

Ownership and current players play a big part of a coaches/GM's success.
as bad as the Turner era was, I felt like the skins could win any game. they always had a decent game plan. Keep in mind, If Matt Turk makes a good snap in the playoff game against tampa, We go on to the championship game against the rams.
I like the Bruce/holt vs Green/Bailey matchup. I think we wouldve gone to the superbowl that year.

Btw, I still think spurrier would be a good Head Coach. We are still having the same problems with blocking that we had with spurrier except with spurrier we scored points.

Ownership, Coaches and players all need to play their parts. You can't have success without all the parts coming together.