Mark Sanchez at 13th?

[BigHairedAristocrat]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

Well, what Tandler is saying is it's just a player if we take Sanchez...which is true, until we trade up. Then it's multiple players.

I'm also wondering what role Quinn has in all this. Perhaps if Sanchez is there at 5, the Redskins and Browns will trade, but not for the 5th pick, but with Quinn/Campbell/the 13th.

I'd much rather have Campbell in this offense than Quinn, and they do share similar weaknesses, but buying low is a far smarter approach than buying high.

Ultimately, I think the 13th overall pick is going to be a defensive player as a Redskin, and that will be that.

To be honest, i don't like Quinn at all - atleast not for this team. I just see him as a younger Jason Campbell in terms of skills, but without JCs class. To me, hed be nothing more than a shiny new toy for Snyder, without atleast having the potential and "it" factor that Sanchez would bring.

As to your last point, id love to land Maybin. I think if we stayed at 13, the smartest move would be to take the best DE available, and that could be him. IMO the best way to receive dividends from the enormous investment we made in Haynesworth is to put a pass-rushing beast alongside him. I'd be fine with one of the big 4 OTs at 13, but I would be extremely disappointed if we took a LB there. If we bring Washington back and use a lateround pick on an OLB, our LB corps will be fine for 2009.