Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum
Reload this Page Jason Campbell for Vince Young ? Who would you rather have?
Register Forum Rules FAQ Calendar

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Jason Campbell for Vince Young ? Who would you rather have?

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Which Former 1st Round QB Bust Would You Most Want
Matt Leinart 79 42.47%
Brady Quinn 53 28.49%
JaMarcus Russell 3 1.61%
Alex Smith 15 8.06%
Vince Young 36 19.35%
Voters: 186. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-11-2009, 11:40 PM   #10
skins89moss
Playmaker
 
skins89moss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,634
Re: Jason Campbell for Vince Young ? Who would you rather have?
Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
Well we may have to trade a 1st rounder in 2011, but I'm telling u its worth it! Sam is amazing and is a "Pro" style QB already, he was last year's #1 overall pick.
Okay I see it now you live in Oklahoma. Didnt Malcom Kelly go there as well. Hmmm is doing just fine so far. But seriously is Bradford a proptype QB or a spread type QB? Tebow is in the spread 98% of the time.
__________________
www.islandstyleflowers.com Home of the Hawaiian Foam Flowers and Kukui Nut Leis. Great selections and best prices. Redskins Fan Since 1972
skins89moss is offline   Reply With Quote
 

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:00 PM.

Contact Us - Commanders Post at The Warpath - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.61133 seconds with 12 queries