Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Good cap article

Locker Room Main Forum


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-10-2006, 12:25 AM   #4
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
Re: Good cap article

I guess my numbers were right then (or pretty close).

the cap wont haunt us cause of good GM choices the last 2 years now. lavar's contract was a HUGE monkey. Letting Pierce and Smoot go also saved tons of money. Smoot was offered a 30mill contract, carlos will be almost half that. That means only brunell, samuels, and wynn have bad price/performance contracts (and they aren't terrible, though still overvalued).

Quote:
If the teams collectively spend more than the salary cap in a season -- which is possible since the cap is a flexible spending limit -- the cap would be automatically adjusted downward in subsequent seasons. If the teams collectively spend less than the salary cap in a season, the cap would be automatically adjusted upward in the future
anyone got specifics on the new cash over cap thing? if you can adjust your cap up, could you just keep saving till you have like 1billion in cap credits? probably a max and a 1 year carry over, but i can't see how they could have a cap and then let you go over it. i think the whole idea is stupid.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 3.00236 seconds with 11 queries