Redskins over/under

[5RINGS]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

I'm just going to toss a few out there, if you want to add some feel free.

Simply discuss whether you think the number will go over or under and why.

Wins: 10

Brunell:
3000 yards
20 TDs
10 INTs

Portis:
1400 yards
10 TDs

Moss:
75 catches
1200 yards
8 TDs

Cooley:
65 catches
650 yards
7 TDs

Carter:
10 sacks

Taylor:
5 INTs

Wins - 11 Tough Division.

Brunell - Under no way he goes all season without missing games.
Portis - over 1400 yards 10 Td sounds right
Moss - under - not going to surprise anyone this year. Not even Dallas
Cooley - Under, Brunell now has options other than Moss Or Portis
Carter - Don't Know. If there are ANY injuries on the DLine he is doubled every snap.

Taylor - Over He should be able to ball hawk and leave the box more with Arch signed

[TheMalcolmConnection]

Originally Posted by 5RINGS

Wins - 11 Tough Division.

Brunell - Under no way he goes all season without missing games.
Portis - over 1400 yards 10 Td sounds right
Moss - under - not going to surprise anyone this year. Not even Dallas
Cooley - Under, Brunell now has options other than Moss Or Portis
Carter - Don't Know. If there are ANY injuries on the DLine he is doubled every snap.

Taylor - Over He should be able to ball hawk and leave the box more with Arch signed

Not sure if you know a whole lot about the Skins backups, but they are pretty interchangable pieces in GW's puzzle. The interior defensive line is like a well-oiled machine, only an injury to Daniels might hurt the Skins and still they have Demetric Evans who was a force late in the season.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

Not sure if you know a whole lot about the Skins backups, but they are pretty interchangable pieces in GW's puzzle. The interior defensive line is like a well-oiled machine, only an injury to Daniels might hurt the Skins and still they have Demetric Evans who was a force late in the season.

Just to add, our d-line actually has some nice depth going this year. We beefed up at DT in the draft, and with Wynn, Daniels, and now Carter we have nice depth at DE.

[ArtMonkDrillz]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Just to add, our d-line actually has some nice depth going this year. We beefed up at DT in the draft, and with Wynn, Daniels, and now Carter we have nice depth at DE.

This is kind of dumb, but would McCune be too small to use as a DE if the d-line were desperate?

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by ArtMonkDrillz

This is kind of dumb, but would McCune be too small to use as a DE if the d-line were desperate?

Chris Clemons plays a great rush end, but if Carter is on the field, there really is no need for him.