![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#16 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!
my point about the philly thing is, they run the ball about 15-20 times a game. westbrooke will get 10-12 of those carries. so we didnt want duckett running the ball against us, what, about 8 carries a game? last time i checked, he is not jim brown
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#17 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,439
|
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!
Quote:
If you have to make a major trade that early in the season because your featured running back goes down, then obviously your team is not set up correctly from the beginning. That's why you have backup players, and players capable of carrying the load until your intended player can return to the lineup. If you have to make a trade because a starter goes down, that certainly does not speak very well of your backups. There were some who lend credence to the concept Duckett was signed to keep him from signing with a division foe. I would have no problem with that either if their intention was to keep him, and signing him to a new contract.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Fayettenam, NC
Age: 53
Posts: 806
|
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!
You keep on living in your fantasy world. If you think snyder has no input you have another thing coming. He is in on everything......just remember the decision makers for this franchise they go in this order snyder, gibbs, cerrato. Snyder holds the tie breaking vote. So you do the math on that one.
__________________
The future is obviously right now! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,836
|
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!
Quote:
Seriously, stop with the Snyder bashing. All the evidence that is available to us indicates that Snyder has bent over backwards to accomidate our revered HOF coach. There are only a few owners in this league I would rather have controlling my team than him. He wants to win and will pony up amounts of money for that that no one else will. The reasons for this team's lack of success have had less to do with him every year since 2000, and I would argue, nothing to do with him this year. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,836
|
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!
Regarding the author of this thread, as Brent Musberger would say, we should nickname you Scoop.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 170
|
![]()
*bows*
__________________
good news for people who like bad news |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Fayettenam, NC
Age: 53
Posts: 806
|
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!
Quote:
thats called a figure of speech. i am not going to debate this with you. we are stuck with dan snyder.
__________________
The future is obviously right now! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,836
|
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Venice Beach, CA
Age: 53
Posts: 345
|
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|