Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


What was the LLoyd vs ARE arguement about at the end of the game?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-04-2006, 08:47 PM   #1
BeastsoftheNFCeast
Special Teams
 
BeastsoftheNFCeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 331
Re: What was the LLoyd vs ARE arguement about at the end of the game?

Quote:
Originally Posted by LMsexyAO View Post
What is your problem, man. The ball has to be thrown to them before they can get yards; you make it seem like they are dropping every pass that comes to them. They are solid additions in my opinion. Plus you've got your stats wrong.. ever hear of a guy named Chris Cooley? Our offensive passing game has been very short-yardage stuff (Pre-Campbell at least) with the exception of Moss and Cooley, ergo it's not completely their fault. Cut them some slack.
First off, Chris Cooley doesn't count, I said Wide Recievers. I don't actually think they're bad players, I'm not pissed at them at all, I'm more or less pissed at the coaching staff, the bad contracts they've signed, and then they don't use the players they sign. I was just expressing my extreme frustration. And I honestly think that anyone else who isn't as pissed as I am at this situation isn't a true skins fan.
BeastsoftheNFCeast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 09:08 PM   #2
LMsexyAO
Impact Rookie
 
LMsexyAO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 684
Re: What was the LLoyd vs ARE arguement about at the end of the game?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BeastsoftheNFCeast View Post
First off, Chris Cooley doesn't count, I said Wide Recievers. I don't actually think they're bad players, I'm not pissed at them at all, I'm more or less pissed at the coaching staff, the bad contracts they've signed, and then they don't use the players they sign. I was just expressing my extreme frustration. And I honestly think that anyone else who isn't as pissed as I am at this situation isn't a true skins fan.
If you're frustrated with their lack of use, then yeah I'm pissed too. But I don't see why Cooley doesn't count, yes he's not a WR, but he does everything they do and more. Isn't a TE just a bigger, tougher, slower WR? Also, don't start playing the, "you're not a skins fan!" card. That doesn't work. Ever.
LMsexyAO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 10:36 PM   #3
BeastsoftheNFCeast
Special Teams
 
BeastsoftheNFCeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 331
Re: What was the LLoyd vs ARE arguement about at the end of the game?

Quote:
Originally Posted by LMsexyAO View Post
If you're frustrated with their lack of use, then yeah I'm pissed too. But I don't see why Cooley doesn't count, yes he's not a WR, but he does everything they do and more. Isn't a TE just a bigger, tougher, slower WR? Also, don't start playing the, "you're not a skins fan!" card. That doesn't work. Ever.
TE's are not the same as WR's, they don't catch as well, if any WR dropped as many passes as Cooley, he wouldn't make it on any roster next season. Also WR's spread the field more, have more deep plays designed to them, are better route runners, and any other difference you can think of. If TE's were the same as WR's, then why would any team have WR's if the TE's can block also? Also, the "you're not a skins fan!" card works every time, lol.
BeastsoftheNFCeast is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.49364 seconds with 11 queries