![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Skins expected to sign Fletcher
Quote:
I'm not saying that Marshall is some Pro-Bowl MLB stud, but I don't think he's as bad as you are saying (i.e., that he is a "role player"). Again, I'm not sure how you can honestly attribute our woes on defense last season to Marshall and call him a role player, and simultaneously give him no credit for the defense's play in 2005. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Skins expected to sign Fletcher
Quote:
In '05 Marshall was average (had a decent amount of tackles and made some nice interceptions). Last year he was hurt so he was below average. In '05 they had better line and secondary play so Marshall didn't stick out. Last year, the line and secondary played worse (Holdman played the same) and Marshall was exposed. Don't take my word for it, ask Brian Mitchell. He pointed it out several times last year (along with many other analysts). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,508
|
Re: Skins expected to sign Fletcher
Hey! Remember, there are no starters in a Greg Williams Defense. Honestly, I hope there aren't too many people that would poo-poo the team for having Washington, Fletcher, McIntosh and Marshall as their linebacking core. That's not too bad, really.
__________________
"I hope I'm getting better. I hope you haven't seen my best." - Jim Zorn |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|