![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: A. Thomas vs. L. Fletcher
Quote:
But it doesn't take a football wizard to ponder the question of a player's actual value when he's no longer wanted by his own team. Barring a personality conflict with coaching or the organization, have we fallen into the trap of thinking that we can solve all of our problems by sifting through the trash cans of other teams? Not saying that Fletcher is "garbage" in the literal sense, but ... the question has to be addressed. When a franchise like the Redskins makes 'dumpster diving' a chief form of personnel acquisition, how good do you honestly expect your team to be when you've stocked your roster with players from teams that aren't any good, and aren't desired by anybody else? Maybe Fletcher will be the exception to the rule. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: A. Thomas vs. L. Fletcher
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: A. Thomas vs. L. Fletcher
Quote:
Renaldo Wynn Bruce Smith Mark Carrier Jeff George Jacquez Green Reidel Anthony Trung Canidate Darrell Russell Daryl Gardener Jessie Armstead Jeremiah Trotter Danny Wuerffel Shane Mathews Brandon Noble Joe Salave'a - wasn't even in another team's garbage can, was out of football Philip Daniels Those are just the guys I can think of -- I know there's more. The defensive line seems to be the recipient of most of the garbage, as evidenced by this team's neglect of that position in every single draft since 1997. Some, like Salave'a and Daniels have worked out OK, but it still represents this organization's tendency to treat the defensive line as an afterthought. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: A. Thomas vs. L. Fletcher
So long as we're counting on PFT for our Fletcher news:
POSTED 7:46 p.m. EST; UPDATED 7:56 p.m. EST, February 26, 2007 FLETCHER DEAL NOT DONE? Although there are rampant rumors that the Washington Redskins have reached a deal with Bills middle linebacker London Fletcher, a source close to Fletcher says that a final decision has not been made. The Redskins, Patriots, Lions, and Bills are interested in Fletcher, and the source says that the Bills currently are the favorites to land London, with the Redskins at No.2 on the list. Ideally, however, the Bills should have the exclusive ability to negotiate with Fletcher until Friday. But that's simply not how it works in the NFL anymore; virtually every team violates the prohibition on tampering when the time comes to talk to pending free agents. Indeed, we're not aware of a single team that doesn't get an early start on chatting with players who technically are the property of others.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 45
Posts: 368
|
Re: A. Thomas vs. L. Fletcher
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: A. Thomas vs. L. Fletcher
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: A. Thomas vs. L. Fletcher
Quote:
The point, as evidenced by our overall record since Dan Snyder took over, is to make note of how poor those decisions were, ... not that it needed to be pointed out, it's been beaten to death here, but hey -- that's what this site is for. All of this stemmed from the discussion of London Fletcher, whose signing I support, but with the admission that it could be yet another washed up has been that the Redskins are so famous for attracting. By the same token, I would also say that it's equally as redundant to say that the New England Patriots do a far better job at evaluating the free agent market than the Washinton Redskins do. That New England is reportedly interested in Fletcher may speak well for the intentions of our front office. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,508
|
Re: A. Thomas vs. L. Fletcher
That's right. Here's a project: buy a company and set yourself a goal like "Be the #1 company out of 32 companies like this one in less than a year." Now, go out and hire 4 or 5 key guys to help you achieve this goal. Where are you first going to look? Monster? Help Wanted? Probably not. You'll make a list of people you know that you feel comfortable with and have positive experience working with....at least that's what I would do.
__________________
"I hope I'm getting better. I hope you haven't seen my best." - Jim Zorn |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: A. Thomas vs. L. Fletcher
Quote:
a bunch of thoses guys were super cheap, and gardener and noble both gave a good year before moving on. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|