Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


A. Thomas vs. L. Fletcher

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-26-2007, 07:32 PM   #1
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
Re: A. Thomas vs. L. Fletcher

Quote:
Originally Posted by sportscurmudgeon View Post
By the way, this business of "knowing the system" is really overrated. London Fletcher "knows the system" in Buffalo but they are not falling all over themselves to keep him. Guess that shows how critical "knowing the system" must be.
Yet another brilliant point that seems to have been overlooked by many, including me. I've generally been in favor of the idea of bringing in Fletcher -- he's a veteran, he knows the system, he makes a lot of tackles, and seems to be an affordable upgrade. Yep, I've fallen in line with the "conventional wisdom" on him.

But it doesn't take a football wizard to ponder the question of a player's actual value when he's no longer wanted by his own team. Barring a personality conflict with coaching or the organization, have we fallen into the trap of thinking that we can solve all of our problems by sifting through the trash cans of other teams? Not saying that Fletcher is "garbage" in the literal sense, but ... the question has to be addressed.

When a franchise like the Redskins makes 'dumpster diving' a chief form of personnel acquisition, how good do you honestly expect your team to be when you've stocked your roster with players from teams that aren't any good, and aren't desired by anybody else?

Maybe Fletcher will be the exception to the rule.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2007, 07:36 PM   #2
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
Re: A. Thomas vs. L. Fletcher

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven View Post
When a franchise like the Redskins makes 'dumpster diving' a chief form of personnel acquisition, how good do you honestly expect your team to be when you've stocked your roster with players from teams that aren't any good, and aren't desired by anybody else?

Maybe Fletcher will be the exception to the rule.
Aside from last offseason, who have we gone "dumpster diving" for since 2000? Have we picked up guys like Barrow from other teams? Sure, but every team does and we didn't exactly break the bank for him.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2007, 07:57 PM   #3
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
Re: A. Thomas vs. L. Fletcher

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha View Post
Aside from last offseason, who have we gone "dumpster diving" for since 2000? Have we picked up guys like Barrow from other teams? Sure, but every team does and we didn't exactly break the bank for him.
Now again, when I say 'dumpster diving' or 'sifting through other teams' trash' I don't necessarily mean they're "garbage" in the literal sense, (though some of them certainly were), I'm talking about taking players that were no longer wanted, or there was no real push to retain them by their original teams. But just off the top of my head, here goes:

Renaldo Wynn
Bruce Smith
Mark Carrier
Jeff George
Jacquez Green
Reidel Anthony
Trung Canidate
Darrell Russell
Daryl Gardener
Jessie Armstead
Jeremiah Trotter
Danny Wuerffel
Shane Mathews
Brandon Noble
Joe Salave'a - wasn't even in another team's garbage can, was out of football
Philip Daniels


Those are just the guys I can think of -- I know there's more. The defensive line seems to be the recipient of most of the garbage, as evidenced by this team's neglect of that position in every single draft since 1997. Some, like Salave'a and Daniels have worked out OK, but it still represents this organization's tendency to treat the defensive line as an afterthought.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2007, 08:12 PM   #4
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: A. Thomas vs. L. Fletcher

So long as we're counting on PFT for our Fletcher news:

POSTED 7:46 p.m. EST; UPDATED 7:56 p.m. EST, February 26, 2007

FLETCHER DEAL NOT DONE?

Although there are rampant rumors that the Washington Redskins have reached a deal with Bills middle linebacker London Fletcher, a source close to Fletcher says that a final decision has not been made.

The Redskins, Patriots, Lions, and Bills are interested in Fletcher, and the source says that the Bills currently are the favorites to land London, with the Redskins at No.2 on the list.

Ideally, however, the Bills should have the exclusive ability to negotiate with Fletcher until Friday. But that's simply not how it works in the NFL anymore; virtually every team violates the prohibition on tampering when the time comes to talk to pending free agents. Indeed, we're not aware of a single team that doesn't get an early start on chatting with players who technically are the property of others.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2007, 09:16 PM   #5
amorentz
Special Teams
 
amorentz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 45
Posts: 368
Re: A. Thomas vs. L. Fletcher

Quote:
Originally Posted by TAFKAS View Post
So long as we're counting on PFT for our Fletcher news:

POSTED 7:46 p.m. EST; UPDATED 7:56 p.m. EST, February 26, 2007

FLETCHER DEAL NOT DONE?

Although there are rampant rumors that the Washington Redskins have reached a deal with Bills middle linebacker London Fletcher, a source close to Fletcher says that a final decision has not been made.

The Redskins, Patriots, Lions, and Bills are interested in Fletcher, and the source says that the Bills currently are the favorites to land London, with the Redskins at No.2 on the list.

Ideally, however, the Bills should have the exclusive ability to negotiate with Fletcher until Friday. But that's simply not how it works in the NFL anymore; virtually every team violates the prohibition on tampering when the time comes to talk to pending free agents. Indeed, we're not aware of a single team that doesn't get an early start on chatting with players who technically are the property of others.
This pretty well puts an end to the argument that we should be concerned because "his own team doesnt want him." Apparently they do, they just might not be willing to pay him what he wants...
amorentz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2007, 08:24 PM   #6
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
Re: A. Thomas vs. L. Fletcher

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven View Post
Now again, when I say 'dumpster diving' or 'sifting through other teams' trash' I don't necessarily mean they're "garbage" in the literal sense, (though some of them certainly were), I'm talking about taking players that were no longer wanted, or there was no real push to retain them by their original teams. But just off the top of my head, here goes:

Renaldo Wynn
Bruce Smith
Mark Carrier
Jeff George
Jacquez Green
Reidel Anthony
Trung Canidate
Darrell Russell
Daryl Gardener
Jessie Armstead
Jeremiah Trotter
Danny Wuerffel
Shane Mathews
Brandon Noble
Joe Salave'a - wasn't even in another team's garbage can, was out of football
Philip Daniels
Almost all of the above players were signed for practically nothing or were from 2000. Moreover, what team doesn't "dumpster dive?" In fact, the Patriots do an awful lot of "dumspter diving" and they've done quite well for themselves.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2007, 08:50 PM   #7
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
Re: A. Thomas vs. L. Fletcher

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha View Post
Almost all of the above players were signed for practically nothing or were from 2000. Moreover, what team doesn't "dumpster dive?" In fact, the Patriots do an awful lot of "dumspter diving" and they've done quite well for themselves.
The point was not to illustrate how much cap space was taken or how we really got burned with back loaded contracts and dead money -- some of those signings were relatively insignificant cap wise.

The point, as evidenced by our overall record since Dan Snyder took over, is to make note of how poor those decisions were, ... not that it needed to be pointed out, it's been beaten to death here, but hey -- that's what this site is for. All of this stemmed from the discussion of London Fletcher, whose signing I support, but with the admission that it could be yet another washed up has been that the Redskins are so famous for attracting.

By the same token, I would also say that it's equally as redundant to say that the New England Patriots do a far better job at evaluating the free agent market than the Washinton Redskins do. That New England is reportedly interested in Fletcher may speak well for the intentions of our front office.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2007, 09:17 AM   #8
724Skinsfan
Playmaker
 
724Skinsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,508
Re: A. Thomas vs. L. Fletcher

That's right. Here's a project: buy a company and set yourself a goal like "Be the #1 company out of 32 companies like this one in less than a year." Now, go out and hire 4 or 5 key guys to help you achieve this goal. Where are you first going to look? Monster? Help Wanted? Probably not. You'll make a list of people you know that you feel comfortable with and have positive experience working with....at least that's what I would do.
__________________
"I hope I'm getting better. I hope you haven't seen my best." - Jim Zorn
724Skinsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2007, 11:13 PM   #9
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
Re: A. Thomas vs. L. Fletcher

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven View Post
Now again, when I say 'dumpster diving' or 'sifting through other teams' trash' I don't necessarily mean they're "garbage" in the literal sense, (though some of them certainly were), I'm talking about taking players that were no longer wanted, or there was no real push to retain them by their original teams. But just off the top of my head, here goes:

Renaldo Wynn
Bruce Smith
Mark Carrier
Jeff George
Jacquez Green
Reidel Anthony
Trung Canidate
Darrell Russell
Daryl Gardener
Jessie Armstead
Jeremiah Trotter
Danny Wuerffel
Shane Mathews
Brandon Noble
Joe Salave'a - wasn't even in another team's garbage can, was out of football
Philip Daniels


Those are just the guys I can think of -- I know there's more. The defensive line seems to be the recipient of most of the garbage, as evidenced by this team's neglect of that position in every single draft since 1997. Some, like Salave'a and Daniels have worked out OK, but it still represents this organization's tendency to treat the defensive line as an afterthought.
so dumpster diving is signing any free agent that doesn't stay with his old team... which means every free agent there ever was lol.

a bunch of thoses guys were super cheap, and gardener and noble both gave a good year before moving on.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.31328 seconds with 11 queries