Postgame: NY

SUNRA · 09-19-2004, 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedskinRat

Coles had 100 yards, it wasn't all bad, however......

I don't want to sit through another Dallas win next Monday Night. Get it sorted out.

Don't worry you won't. This morning when I got up I actually saw myself leaving dissappointed at this game. However, the Dallas game has to be the biggest game of the season because we have the opportunity to redeem ourselves after this gift to the Giants. We will beat them Cowb****es.

Paintrain · 09-19-2004, 06:47 PM

My disgusted impressions of the game..

Brunell, get rid of the ball faster, if the Giants' DBs could catch you could tack 2-3 more turnovers onto the total..

Speaking of turnovers, 7?!?!??! Good God they were bad today..

OL didn't show up at all, I think they came in overconfident after TB..

Ramsey needs to learn it's ok to throw the ball away, that last INT was simply amatuerish.. If it's not there, drill the guy in the neon vest..

I'm not going to get down on Portis, just a bad day..

Gardner needs to be demoted, I'd rather see what Taylor Jacobs can do.. There's a reason that Gardner's nickname on the team is 50/50..

Williams punked out a little bit by not blitzing more in the 4th quarter, but I was still happy with the performance of the defense.

All in all, 7 turnovers, numerous drops and sacks and we were still in position to take the lead 3 times in the 4th quarter I can just hope we get to the point that we don't beat ourselves..

SUNRA · 09-19-2004, 07:00 PM

Amen, Paintrain. I mean how many mistakes can veterans of this game make? Either they don't understand the plays their running or are simply incapable of executing these plays. You better believe Coach Gibbs will be up all night reviewing tapes of this game. This game will be the model for what not to do on offense. We will rebound against the Cowboys.

redwagonskins · 09-19-2004, 07:12 PM

By the way, did anyone notice that even though Portis fumbled twice, he was still heavily involved with the game even if he wasn't getting touches. He had two de-cleating blocks that I can recall.

SUNRA · 09-19-2004, 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redwagonskins

By the way, did anyone notice that even though Portis fumbled twice, he was still heavily involved with the game even if he wasn't getting touches. He had two de-cleating blocks that I can recall.

Yes, he caught a TD and had another pass he dropped that would have continued our drive. The Giants was talking a lot of smack. And I think it got to Portis a little. I think Portis owes us next week. The O line is not responsible for his fumbles.

Gmanc711 · 09-19-2004, 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redwagonskins

By the way, did anyone notice that even though Portis fumbled twice, he was still heavily involved with the game even if he wasn't getting touches. He had two de-cleating blocks that I can recall.

I did notice that. The commentaros also noticed that, and said that he was proboly trying to hustle to make up for some of his other mistakes. They aslo said it was nice to see a 50 million dollar man still hustling all over the feild. I mean I'm not happy with his performance, but that defintley made up for some of the mistakes he made. He's not going to fumble like that a ton of the time. We cant give up on him either. He's the type of back that will go 4, 3 , 4 , 6 , then break one big. In any event it was nice to see him still hustling, it can change the course of a game ( ala Coles last year vs Seattle ) and almost did today.

monk81 · 09-19-2004, 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redwagonskins

By the way, did anyone notice that even though Portis fumbled twice, he was still heavily involved with the game even if he wasn't getting touches. He had two de-cleating blocks that I can recall.

If you fumble like Portis did you better hell as do something to help the team like blocking........ big deal I don't go for the smack got to him causing him to make mistakes...come on-- the man heard smack in college and while he played for Denver.....

redwagonskins · 09-19-2004, 07:50 PM

Harsh monk!

All I'm saying is that he didn't give up and that is why we had a chance at the end of the game.

monk81 · 09-19-2004, 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redwagonskins

Harsh monk!

All I'm saying is that he didn't give up and that is why we had a chance at the end of the game.

Sorry Red...they are showing the Skins/Gints game on Prime Time and it got me all riled up again. I'm glad he did something to help his team, but he's still gonna hear it from the coaches when they check out the game film.............. Peace.

P.S. The Redskins lose, Cowboys win...and I just ai'nt happy right now, nothing personal

That Guy · 09-19-2004, 08:46 PM

coles showed up... he only had one mistake... portis had a dropped pass and 2 fumbles, but still put up about 100 yards and a TD, and almost converted 3rd and 23... gardner dropped something like 7 passes he should have caught... i want to see mccants or jacobs (burner) tested out...

i know ramsey had 3 picks, but brunell gave up the points before hand, and couldn't throw a pass longer than 7 yards... THAT'S A PROBLEM, his arm strength sucks, just like it has in preseason (minus that great 63yarder to mccants).

right now neither QB really looks like an error free starter, and tims not the answer, so please, don't...

sean wasn't sharp, but he's a rookie... on D, we need a good DE or two, as well as a good coverage SS... bowen just isn't fast enough, or he makes bad reads...

SUNRA · 09-19-2004, 09:08 PM

Anyone think Gibbs need to implement the shotgun although he never uses it. It was a Cowboys play afterall?

illdefined · 09-19-2004, 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SUNRA

Anyone think Gibbs need to implement the shotgun although he never uses it. It was a Cowboys play afterall?

maybe not shotgun, but at least some rollouts. whatever WORKS.

did our TEs/HBacks not block well??

Shane · 09-19-2004, 09:18 PM

I think that the Redskins will phase Gardner out and replace him with Taylor Jacobs and or McCants.

At quarterback, Ramsey is a good guy who isn’t prepared to lead our team in my opinion. If Brunell’s mobility is seriously limited, then Tim Hasselbeck will find his way into the lineup before long. I think Hasselbeck is our best hope for injecting needed dynamism into our offense. We need a quarterback who not only avoids critical mistakes but provides electric leadership and inspiring play. I think Hasselbeck will rise to the occasion given an opportunity.

We can become an excellent playoff contender if we phase in Hasselbeck, and Jacobs and/or McCants.

Gmanc711 · 09-19-2004, 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shane

We can become an excellent playoff contender if we phase in Hasselbeck, and Jacobs and/or McCants.

I need a lot of alcohol.

That Guy · 09-19-2004, 10:08 PM

shane, hasselbeck has more ints than TDs, unlike either brunell or ramsey... minus one preseason game against 3rd stringers, he hasn't really lit anything up...

he not only makes critical mistakes, he doesn't provide either electric leadership or inspiring play.

09-19-2004, 07:00 PM	#3
SUNRA The Starter Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 1,680	Amen, Paintrain. I mean how many mistakes can veterans of this game make? Either they don't understand the plays their running or are simply incapable of executing these plays. You better believe Coach Gibbs will be up all night reviewing tapes of this game. This game will be the model for what not to do on offense. We will rebound against the Cowboys. __________________ Redskins Member since 1970

09-19-2004, 09:08 PM	#11
SUNRA The Starter Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 1,680	Anyone think Gibbs need to implement the shotgun although he never uses it. It was a Cowboys play afterall? __________________ Redskins Member since 1970

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

09-19-2004, 06:47 PM	#2
Paintrain Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL Age: 54 Posts: 5,006	My disgusted impressions of the game.. Brunell, get rid of the ball faster, if the Giants' DBs could catch you could tack 2-3 more turnovers onto the total.. Speaking of turnovers, 7?!?!??! Good God they were bad today.. OL didn't show up at all, I think they came in overconfident after TB.. Ramsey needs to learn it's ok to throw the ball away, that last INT was simply amatuerish.. If it's not there, drill the guy in the neon vest.. I'm not going to get down on Portis, just a bad day.. Gardner needs to be demoted, I'd rather see what Taylor Jacobs can do.. There's a reason that Gardner's nickname on the team is 50/50.. Williams punked out a little bit by not blitzing more in the 4th quarter, but I was still happy with the performance of the defense. All in all, 7 turnovers, numerous drops and sacks and we were still in position to take the lead 3 times in the 4th quarter I can just hope we get to the point that we don't beat ourselves..

09-19-2004, 07:12 PM	#4
redwagonskins Impact Rookie Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: San Diego Posts: 685	By the way, did anyone notice that even though Portis fumbled twice, he was still heavily involved with the game even if he wasn't getting touches. He had two de-cleating blocks that I can recall.

09-19-2004, 07:50 PM	#8
redwagonskins Impact Rookie Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: San Diego Posts: 685	Harsh monk! All I'm saying is that he didn't give up and that is why we had a chance at the end of the game.

09-19-2004, 08:46 PM	#10
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: VA Age: 42 Posts: 17,620	coles showed up... he only had one mistake... portis had a dropped pass and 2 fumbles, but still put up about 100 yards and a TD, and almost converted 3rd and 23... gardner dropped something like 7 passes he should have caught... i want to see mccants or jacobs (burner) tested out... i know ramsey had 3 picks, but brunell gave up the points before hand, and couldn't throw a pass longer than 7 yards... THAT'S A PROBLEM, his arm strength sucks, just like it has in preseason (minus that great 63yarder to mccants). right now neither QB really looks like an error free starter, and tims not the answer, so please, don't... sean wasn't sharp, but he's a rookie... on D, we need a good DE or two, as well as a good coverage SS... bowen just isn't fast enough, or he makes bad reads...

09-19-2004, 09:18 PM	#13
Shane Special Teams Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 277	I think that the Redskins will phase Gardner out and replace him with Taylor Jacobs and or McCants. At quarterback, Ramsey is a good guy who isn’t prepared to lead our team in my opinion. If Brunell’s mobility is seriously limited, then Tim Hasselbeck will find his way into the lineup before long. I think Hasselbeck is our best hope for injecting needed dynamism into our offense. We need a quarterback who not only avoids critical mistakes but provides electric leadership and inspiring play. I think Hasselbeck will rise to the occasion given an opportunity. We can become an excellent playoff contender if we phase in Hasselbeck, and Jacobs and/or McCants.

09-19-2004, 10:08 PM	#15
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: VA Age: 42 Posts: 17,620	shane, hasselbeck has more ints than TDs, unlike either brunell or ramsey... minus one preseason game against 3rd stringers, he hasn't really lit anything up... he not only makes critical mistakes, he doesn't provide either electric leadership or inspiring play.

Postgame: NY

Locker Room Main Forum