![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#46 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Wash DC
Posts: 368
|
Re: Spagnuolo is looking good (Defense)
His unit played hard and shut down the patriots. All this shows is that he has a genuinely articulate football mind. I don't doubt that he would be a great coach for us, and after watching the game, I feel more comfortable in seeing hime bring that mentality to DC
__________________
http://zstiojar.edu.pl/68560 |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
#47 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 478
|
Re: Spagnuolo is looking good (Defense)
Don't know about the Spags logic here...He just won a SB as the DC but I don't know that he can handle a HC job. Plus we already have continuity on Defense with Blache...WHy do we want another defensive guy coming in and messing with things? Why not get an offensive guy, who will work with Zorn (who is himself inexperienced)? Mooch is starting to shakeout as my favorite candidate...Besides, he is worth it for his "Mic'd up" segments on the sideline when he is yelling at refs and shouting to players, jk. But seriously the guy deserves his own show for those sound bites.
__________________
McNasty FTW! |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bristol, CT
Age: 61
Posts: 1,001
|
Re: Welcome Home Spags!!!
After watching the G-Men defense come together this year... shut down the Cowboys and Pack on the road... make the Patriots offense look weak. My pick is officially Spags.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Halfmoon, NY
Posts: 687
|
Re: Spagnuolo is looking good (Defense)
Absolutely, but to do so we need defensive coaches who would put pressure on the FO to actually draft a monster DE. For years, the Skins have been in love with drafting secondary and LB's, completely forgoing d-line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 105
|
Re: Welcome Home Spags!!!
I'll give you guys the Giants line is much better then ours, but....don’t you feel that our LB's, and secondary are better. What I'm getting at with Spag’s is that he will have better talent in two other departments + we are just stupid if we don’t draft D-End with our first pick this year. I could go Moch or Spags at this point, but it’s hard to decide as we have absolutly 0 insights into who wanted the coordinators that we have already hired.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#51 |
|
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,846
|
Re: Welcome Home Spags!!!
LOL Spags is the flavor of the day.
![]() I think he did a great job with the Giants D but I'm not so sure I'd want to crown him just yet. I think Fassel will be the guy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Franklin, TN
Posts: 214
|
Re: Welcome Home Spags!!!
I am not ready to crown Spags as HC...like most here agree he did a great job in the Super Bowl but what we all saw was a good old fashion domination by the D-Line! Plain and simply the DE's got to Brady...and when that happens your holes in the secondary are covered up...Lets take note for the draft!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,994
|
Re: Welcome Home Spags!!!
I heard on ESPN Radio this morning that Spags is scheduled to meet with Dan Snyder about the head coaching position in Washington.
Who better to coach in the most talented and dominate division in the NFC, than a coach with several years experience (Philly and NYG) coaching against that division? Spags is an excellent candidate. |
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,592
|
Re: Spagnuolo is looking good (Defense)
Im down with Spags or Mooch, and wouldn't be completely disappointed with Fassel. But you can't give a cool nickname to him. . . sooo
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
|
Re: Spagnuolo is looking good (Defense)
While I agree that 1 year as a DC doesn't make a coach, from all reports the guy is pretty impressive. He spent 7 years (i believe, w/out looking it up) working as a position coach under Jim Johnson (Eagles). So, it's not as if he's a newbie. So i wouldn't be that upset.
Now, why would we bring him in when we already have a DC in Blache? Maybe Spags has a problem w/ it and Danny Boy would just let Blache have a DC title for kicks-like last year. I just don't know anymore. |
|
|
|
|
|
#56 | |
|
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,846
|
Re: Spagnuolo is looking good (Defense)
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Spagnuolo is looking good (Defense)
Quote:
Kenard Lang - 1997. The Redskins have never been a team that has put much of an emphasis on drafting high for D-linemen. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,453
|
Re: Spagnuolo is looking good (Defense)
I find it funny how everyone thinks Spagnuolo has some magic defensive plan or something. What he has is 3 guys that can simply get after the passer. Actually 4 but Mathias K. is hurt. IMO the GM should be getting the credit. Where did Justin Tuck come from?? NE's O-line just got beat down all night long. Man on man. Plus some nobody came off the bench and got a sack at the end of the game. Nothing fancy about it. But everyone on here is going to think this guy is something special. Let's see how good his defense is when Daniels is rushing the passer. It always comes down to personel people. We're set with the defensive coaches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Welcome Home Spags!!!
Quote:
You do realize that Spags would no longer have the luxury of having ends like Strahan, Umenyora, Tuck and Kiwanuka, right? How do you think he will fare with the likes of Philip Daniels, Andre Carter, Demetric Evans and Chris Wilson? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Spagnuolo is looking good (Defense)
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|