JLC vs. Cerrato takes a new twist?

[saden1]

Originally Posted by Miller101

Well I have a problem with it when a writer intentionally goes out of his way to fuck the Redskins in the ass. His problem with Vinny is his problem, but when you're trying to cost my team a draft pick or two. I have just have a problem with that. And calling up the NFL and mentioning this is doing just that. And I can't believe that wouldn't bother you. Especially, if we do end up losing a draft pick out of this.

I don't really care what JLC does and what he does shouldn't be relevant at all. I find the Redskins potentially putting themselves in a position to be at the mercy of a sports writer more bothersome.

[Sheriff Gonna Getcha]

Originally Posted by saden1

I don't really care what JLC does and what he does shouldn't be relevant at all. I find the Redskins potentially putting themselves in a position to be at the mercy of a sports writer more bothersome.

What VC did/said was not even close to tampering. Moreover, to run to the NFL and try to get the Redskins sanctioned for a non-issue is bothersome and is relevant to whether JLC is a jackass.

[53Fan]

Originally Posted by saden1

I don't really care what JLC does and what he does shouldn't be relevant at all. I find the Redskins potentially putting themselves in a position to be at the mercy of a sports writer more bothersome.

Vinny did'nt do anything wrong. They are'nt at the mercy of JLC or any other sports writer. It just seems screwed up that a so-called professional would try to get a team in trouble because he does'nt like the FO.