![]() |
|
|
#316 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?
If this is true i find it surprising.
Danny pushing hard for Sanchez i get but Zorn? Zorn is a QB coach whose claim to fame is the ability to develop a QB. I would think that a position coach hangs their hats on the ability to coach a player up. Like coaches Gray/Jackson did with Doughty and Horton, or Olividotti with Blades, or Williams/Blache with Monty and Golston or Buges with a list too long to mention. It seems odd for a QB coach to draft a QB with a high pick when he is currently developing a QB and that development is supposed to be his forte. (like a mechanic who doesn't restore his own cars) Also, Zorn stirkes me as a honest guy, almost to a fault. Granted i have no access and i'm only juding based on interviews and post game pressers. But, he doesn't seem like the kind of guy who gives his word lightly and to throw his support behind Campbell then push for Sanchez doesn't fit my impression of Zorn. One statement about Campbell form Zorn that i never forget came from Matt Mosley last summer: What's in Mosley's Mailbag? - NFC East - ESPN Mosley: Albert, you were actually 6,002, but I like the way you phrased your question (praised my work). Jim Zorn didn't come right out and say this to me, but I know for a fact that he's told Campbell he's poised to become a perennial Pro Bowl quarterback. |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
#317 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?
Quote:
Seriously bro, seriously think about what you're saying. Protection and WR talent don't matter?! Are you just angry about something else altogether? Why ignore historical fact and reality toward a point that doesn't prove anything. ...most QBs in the league can be quite good when surrounded by phenomenal talent and great protection. It's that simple. A very small handful can "will" their way to success in lesser conditions. Tom Brady is not among that group. Belichick, aside from the year Reche Caldwell was NE's #1 WR, has always surrounded his QB w/ awesome talent and truly phenomenal pass protection. I would put Brees and even Dono way ahead in that category compared to Brady.
__________________
24-34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#318 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?
Quote:
At this point, I almost want Campbell to go somewhere else and blossom into a star just to prove how ridiculous and impatient our fan base and ownership are. Some people think Campbell has peaked, I think he's far from his peak. I keep drawing the correlation between his first couple of years and Drew Brees first couple of years, very similar on the field and off. I'd hate to have that kind of production being racked up elsewhere down the road but it would serve us right.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#319 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?
Quote:
I'm not saying dump Campbell in favor of Sanchez, but this year has to be put up or shut up. No more excuses. Last edited by Beemnseven; 04-16-2009 at 09:55 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#320 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
|
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?
I actually heard Portis say something smart on ESPN and it got me thinking. When he was asked whether he thought Campbell could be a franchise QB he said yes. He basically said he had the size and talent. He also said if you take away Santana Moss you'd probably have a hard time naming the Skins receivers over the past 5 years. He's right. All of Campbells stats and QB ratings have improved every year he has played. And he has done this with S**T for wide receivers, with the exception of Moss, a constantly changing offensive system, and an aging o-line that cannot stay healthy. The more I think about it, the more I think it would be a big mistake to give up on Jason Campbell right now.
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#321 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?
Quote:
For some reason I don't put much stock into Clinton Portis as a talent evaluator. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#322 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
|
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?
I usually don't put much stock in anything Portis says but in this case he's right. Nothing against ARE but he belongs in the slot where he would flourish. A second receiver he's not. You have to admit though, Portis was right on Sean Taylor.
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#323 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
|
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?
I don't understand why people are so hell bent on getting a QB that's going to throw for 400 yds every game. Honestly, with the defense we had last year, we just needed an offense that can keep us one step ahead and allow us to control the clock when we have the lead. If you look at the elite defenses of last year (Titans, Ravens), their QBs were not setting passing records or anything like that. The easiest thing to do for our team is to get the o-line to protect Campbell and use the offense as a compliment to the defense.
If the team (or should I say, Snyder) wants to have an offense that racks up the yards and is an offense juggernaut, then the defense must be sacrificed. If you look at teams like Indy, Arizona, and New Orleans, who had passing offenses with huge numbers, well those teams usually don't have good defense. Not everyone can be like the New England Patriots (potent offense, with a top notch defense of old guys that won't get hurt) and I don't understand why Snyder (or anyone here) is hell bent on getting a Jay Cutler or another QB that's going to rack up the yards (at the expense of other areas which have typically have been the strength of our team....defense and running game).
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#324 | |
|
Fire Bruce NOW
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?
Quote:
Between 2007 and 2008 JC changed from a turnover machine into a turnover-stingy QB. That already leaves us better off than quite a few qb's would. The next step for him is to get the ball down field more so that his yards per attempt is above 7.0. This is his logical next progression as a QB and my guess is that he is working on this as we speak. He'll need help in this, as he'll need better protection than he has gotten and he'll need Thomas and Kelly to step up their games. However, if he does emerge this year as a turnover-stingy QB with a YPA over 7.0, that's a true NFL QB. That's a keeper.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#325 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?
My apologies guys. My report about Zorn pushing hard for Sanchez turns out to be really misleading. Yes, he's at the forefront of all the meetings with Sanchez but he's not pushing hard for him, not exactly.
I heard the report wrong. Zorn was asked "If not Campbell, then who would you want as your QB?" and that's where is strong interest in Sanchez comes in. Without that first part of the quote it's completely different. Sorry guys, bad reporting on my part there.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#326 | |
|
Fire Bruce NOW
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?
Quote:
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#327 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 23
|
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?
(Suggested Thread Title) Will the Real Jason Campbell Fans Please Stand Up
So I don't have ten replies and can't start a thread, but is there any way the people who really believe in Jason Campbell as the future of the franchise can get together and somehow protest a potential Sanchez trade/show JC our support? I'm not really good with website design but would be happy to produce content. The way the front office is handling this situation is absurd, and before we piss away two more draft picks, perhaps we can rally broad fan opposition to this as well as show Jason Campbell that Snyder may not believe in him, but we do. Seems like a winner on both fronts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#328 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 23
|
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?
Considering that fan reaction kill Fassel, couldn't it work?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#329 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?
Quote:
We won 8 games last year and had the defense not crapped away the St. Louis, Cincy and SF games we would have been in the playoffs. It truly amazes me that some of you guys act like Campbell was out there losing games for us left and right. Seriously, you can't compare all rookie QB to the Falcons or Ravens last year, those were historical anomalies. In both cases, they were game managers supported by a great running game (Atlanta) and a great defense (Baltimore). Please don't be fooled into believing they were the reason they were playoff teams.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#330 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
|
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?
Quote:
![]() It's all good man.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|